GenPT: Beyond Self-Report for Reliable LLM Psychometrics via Generative Projective Testing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Self-report questionnaires remain the prevailing tool for probing the psychological states of persona-conditioned agents (PC-Agents). However, classical instruments inherit two well-known threats: contamination from training corpora and directional bias driven by social-desirability or contextual framing. To overcome these methodological bottlenecks, we ask whether projective paradigms can be adapted into a robust psychometric tool. We introduce GenPT (Generative Projective Testing), which reformulates TAT, Rorschach, and SCT with newly generated stimuli and organizes assessment as a three-stage pipeline to derive standardized psychological indicators and target states. Evaluating PC-Agents induced via CharacterRAG and AnnaAgent profiles, we benchmark GenPT's reliability and validity against classical questionnaires. The results indicate that questionnaires exhibit systematic directional shifts under social-desirability framing, most strongly on suicide ideation. In contrast, GenPT's collected behavioral patterns stay near the symmetric baseline. Furthermore, under a longitudinal counselling context, GenPT-based depression assessment shifts by roughly an order of magnitude more than the questionnaire counterpart when Qwen3 serves as the backbone. Overall, GenPT complements self-report methods in scenarios where contamination resistance, bias asymmetry, and context sensitivity matter. Code and stimuli can be found at https://github.com/sci-m-wang/GenPT.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2026.
Builds on
11 of 30 references.
References · 11
- 2024Scaling Rectified Flow Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,181
- 2024Scaling Synthetic Data Creation with 1,000,000,000 Personascited by 417
- 2024From Persona to Personalization: A Survey on Role-Playing Language Agentscited by 212
- 2023InCharacter: Evaluating Personality Fidelity in Role-Playing Agents through Psychological Interviewscited by 179
- 2025Large Language Model Psychometrics: A Systematic Review of Evaluation, Validation, and Enhancementcited by 45
- 2022D4: a Chinese Dialogue Dataset for Depression-Diagnosis-Oriented Chatcited by 37
- 2025Evaluating Personality Traits in Large Language Models: Insights from Psychological Questionnairescited by 25
- 2025Customizing Emotional Support: How Do Individuals Construct and Interact With LLM-Powered Chatbotscited by 25
- 2024The influence of persona and conversational task on social interactions with a LLM-controlled embodied conversational agentcited by 7
- 2026A Systematic Analysis of the Impact of Persona Steering on LLM Capabilitiescited by 5
- 2025Dynamic Context Adaptation for Consistent Role-Playing Agents with Retrieval-Augmented Generationscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026Do AI Personas Grow? Analyzing and Benchmarking Personality Evolution in LLM Agents After Life Eventscited by 2
- 2026LongCounsel-8: A Benchmark Suite for Longitudinal Depression Tracking from Multi-Session Counseling Dialoguescited by 0
- 2026From Pattern Recognizers to Personalized Companions: A Survey of Large Language Models in Mental Healthcited by 0
- 2026From Pattern Recognizers to Personalized Companions: A Survey of Large Language Models in Mental Health21 Sep 2026
- 2026LongCounsel-8: A Benchmark Suite for Longitudinal Depression Tracking from Multi-Session Counseling Dialogues3 Sep 2026
- 2026Do AI Personas Grow? Analyzing and Benchmarking Personality Evolution in LLM Agents After Life Events6 Aug 2026