A Systematic Analysis of the Impact of Persona Steering on LLM Capabilities
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Imbuing Large Language Models (LLMs) with specific personas is prevalent for tailoring interaction styles, yet the impact on underlying cognitive capabilities remains unexplored. We employ the Neuron-based Personality Trait Induction (NPTI) framework to induce Big Five personality traits in LLMs and evaluate performance across six cognitive benchmarks. Our findings reveal that persona induction produces stable, reproducible shifts in cognitive task performance beyond surface-level stylistic changes. These effects exhibit strong task dependence: certain personalities yield consistent gains on instruction-following, while others impair complex reasoning. Effect magnitude varies systematically by trait dimension, with Openness and Extraversion exerting the most robust influence. Furthermore, LLM effects show 73.68% directional consistency with human personality-cognition relationships. Capitalizing on these regularities, we propose Dynamic Persona Routing (DPR), a lightweight query-adaptive strategy that outperforms the best static persona without additional training.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Apr 2026.
Builds on
9 of 18 references.
References · 9
- 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
- 2022Discovering Language Model Behaviors with Model-Written Evaluationscited by 805
- 2023LaMP: When Large Language Models Meet Personalizationcited by 425
- 2023Towards Measuring the Representation of Subjective Global Opinions in Language Modelscited by 424
- 2023Toxicity in ChatGPT: Analyzing Persona-assigned Language Modelscited by 356
- 2024From Persona to Personalization: A Survey on Role-Playing Language Agentscited by 206
- 2024Two Tales of Persona in LLMs: A Survey of Role-Playing and Personalizationcited by 203
- 2024Neuron-based Personality Trait Induction in Large Language Modelscited by 9
- 2024Behavioral Bias of Vision-Language Models: A Behavioral Finance Viewcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.
5 papers.
- 2026GenPT: Beyond Self-Report for Reliable LLM Psychometrics via Generative Projective Testingcited by 3
- 2026Do AI Personas Grow? Analyzing and Benchmarking Personality Evolution in LLM Agents After Life Eventscited by 2
- 2026The Granularity Axis: A Micro-to-Macro Latent Direction for Social Roles in Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026When Cosine Similarity Fails to Reflect Linearly Accessible Structure in Dialogue Modelscited by 0
- 2026How Well Can LLMs Simulate Real Learner Evaluations of Educational Feedback?cited by 0
- 2026How Well Can LLMs Simulate Real Learner Evaluations of Educational Feedback?28 Sep 2026
- 2026When Cosine Similarity Fails to Reflect Linearly Accessible Structure in Dialogue Models18 Sep 2026
- 2026Do AI Personas Grow? Analyzing and Benchmarking Personality Evolution in LLM Agents After Life Events6 Aug 2026
- 2026GenPT: Beyond Self-Report for Reliable LLM Psychometrics via Generative Projective Testing30 May 2026
- 2026The Granularity Axis: A Micro-to-Macro Latent Direction for Social Roles in Language Models7 May 2026