mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Target-Side Paraphrase Augmentation for Sign Language Translation with Large Language Models

arXiv 2605.31393 ↗First posted 29 May 2026cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Sign language translation (SLT) remains constrained by the limited availability of paired sign-video/text corpora and by the heavy-tailed vocabularies typical of real-world datasets. We study a target-side augmentation strategy in which a large language model (LLM) generates controlled paraphrase variants of the reference spoken-language sentence while the sign input remains unchanged. Concretely, we use GPT-4o to produce semantically faithful variants of the training targets and train a Signformer-style pose-based Transformer under a two-stage schedule: pre-training on the augmented corpus followed by fine-tuning on the original references. We evaluate this strategy on three datasets that span complementary challenges: PHOENIX14T (German Sign Language), a real-world corpus with moderate lexical diversity; the Greek Sign Language Dataset with highly controlled, repetitive recordings; and LSA-T (Argentinian Sign Language), a naturalistic corpus with a large vocabulary and severe long-tail sparsity. This range allows us to characterize precisely when and why target-side augmentation is beneficial. On PHOENIX14T, augmentation improves BLEU-4 from 9.56 to 10.33, demonstrating that paraphrastic exposure helps the decoder generalize beyond memorized reference phrasing. The near-saturated GSL baseline and the extremely sparse LSA-T setting reveal the limits of the approach: in both cases, single-reference lexical overlap metrics are insufficient to capture the full picture, motivating a complementary semantic evaluation. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine LLM-generated target-side paraphrases as an augmentation mechanism for SLT, and the first to apply an LLM-as-a-Judge evaluation protocol to SLT. This complementary evaluation reveals gains in semantic fidelity that lexical overlap metrics understate.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2026.

Builds on

14 of 21 references.

References · 14

  1. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  2. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  3. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,205
  4. 2015Improving Neural Machine Translation Models with Monolingual Datacited by 784
  5. 2023Large Language Models Are State-of-the-Art Evaluators of Translation Qualitycited by 416
  6. 2020Sign Language Transformers: Joint End-to-end Sign Language Recognition and Translationcited by 254
  7. 2019Sign Language Recognition, Generation, and Translation: An Interdisciplinary Perspectivecited by 87
  8. 2024Sign2GPT: Leveraging Large Language Models for Gloss-Free Sign Language Translationcited by 56
  9. 2021Data Augmentation for Sign Language Gloss Translationcited by 28
  10. 2020A Comprehensive Study on Deep Learning-based Methods for Sign Language Recognitioncited by 12
  11. 2022LSA-T: The first continuous Argentinian Sign Language dataset for Sign Language Translationcited by 4
  12. 2024Signformer is all you need: Towards Edge AI for Sign Languagecited by 3
2 more
  1. 2025Using Sign Language Production as Data Augmentation to enhance Sign Language Translationcited by 3
  2. 2025Exploring Pose-based Sign Language Translation: Ablation Studies and Attention Insightscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.