Traceable by Design: An LLM Pipeline and Dashboard for EU Regulatory Consultation Analysis
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Public consultations generate large volumes of data in the form of stakeholder submissions that are practically unfeasible to analyse manually. We present an end-to-end LLM-based pipeline and interactive dashboard for structured topic extraction from regulatory consultation submissions, demonstrated on the European Commission's Digital Fairness Act (DFA) public call for evidence as a case study. The system processes raw PDF attachments and web-form responses, extracts topic annotations, and grounds every extraction in a verbatim quote from the source text. Applied to 4,322 DFA submissions, the pipeline produced 15,368 topic annotations supported by 20,951 verbatim evidence quotes. Three principles govern the proposed design: verbatim grounding, full traceability, and transparency by design. The dashboard exposes the full extraction dataset through five analytical views, from dataset-level topic overviews to individual paragraph drill-downs, with every result traceable to its source. Beyond the predefined DFA topic categories, the pipeline generated certain stakeholder concerns, such as Age Verification, Payment Processor Censorship, and Digital Ownership, that a fixed-taxonomy approach would have missed. The pipeline is domain-generic; adapting it to a new consultation requires only a prompt update and a new dataset. A live demo is available at https://dfa-dashboard.thalesbertaglia.com/. The code and processed data are publicly available at https://github.com/thalesbertaglia/dfa-dashboard.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2026.
Builds on
7 of 17 references.
References · 7
- 2021LexGLUE: A Benchmark Dataset for Legal Language Understanding in Englishcited by 310
- 2021Measuring Attribution in Natural Language Generation Modelscited by 256
- 2020How Does NLP Benefit Legal System: A Summary of Legal Artificial Intelligencecited by 129
- 2022Mining Legal Arguments in Court Decisionscited by 35
- 2019Extreme Multi-Label Legal Text Classification: A case study in EU Legislationcited by 26
- 2023Regulation and NLP (RegNLP): Taming Large Language Modelscited by 5
- 2025Stakeholder Suite: A Unified AI Framework for Mapping Actors, Topics and Arguments in Public Debatescited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.