mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Bandwidth Allocation with Device Partitioning for Federated Learning over Industrial IoT networks

arXiv 2605.30892 ↗First posted 29 May 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider a federated learning (FL) system in which Industrial Internet-of-Things (IIoT) devices collaboratively train a global model over wireless channels without sharing local data. In such systems, communication time is a primary bottleneck that constrains overall training efficiency. Unlike conventional networks that prioritize individual quality-of-service requirements, FL systems collectively aim to converge to an optimal global model as efficiently as possible, which calls for a fundamentally different approach to bandwidth allocation. In this paper, we propose a novel bandwidth allocation policy that exploits the heterogeneity of device computing capabilities to minimize total training time. Rather than distributing bandwidth among all selected devices simultaneously, the proposed policy partitions the participating devices into ordered subsets and sequentially grants each subset exclusive access to the full bandwidth. We formally prove that this partitioning-based policy achieves a strictly lower training time than any bandwidth allocation scheme without partitioning, irrespective of the underlying scheduling algorithm. Furthermore, by reducing per-device transmission duration, the proposed policy also minimizes uplink energy consumption, which is particularly beneficial for battery-constrained IIoT devices. Extensive experiments on real-world datasets - including GC10-Det, an industrial surface defect benchmark, and CIFAR-10, a standard image classification benchmark - demonstrate that the proposed policy consistently reduces training time and energy consumption compared to existing bandwidth allocation schemes, approaching the theoretical lower bound on round time.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2026.

Builds on

16 of 34 references.

References · 16

  1. 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,987
  2. 2019On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID Datacited by 1,229
  3. 2018Federated Learning with Non-IID Datacited by 1,108
  4. 2019Robust and Communication-Efficient Federated Learning from Non-IID Datacited by 419
  5. 2019Energy Efficient Federated Learning Over Wireless Communication Networkscited by 181
  6. 2018Expanding the Reach of Federated Learning by Reducing Client Resource Requirementscited by 163
  7. 2020Client Selection and Bandwidth Allocation in Wireless Federated Learning Networks: A Long-Term Perspectivecited by 103
  8. 2020Joint Device Scheduling and Resource Allocation for Latency Constrained Wireless Federated Learningcited by 90
  9. 2019Accelerating Federated Learning via Momentum Gradient Descentcited by 76
  10. 2020Fast-Convergent Federated Learning with Adaptive Weightingcited by 67
  11. 2020Scheduling for Cellular Federated Edge Learning with Importance and Channel Awarenesscited by 62
  12. 2020Ternary Compression for Communication-Efficient Federated Learningcited by 57
4 more
  1. 2021Federated Dropout -- A Simple Approach for Enabling Federated Learning on Resource Constrained Devicescited by 56
  2. 2019Device Scheduling with Fast Convergence for Wireless Federated Learningcited by 46
  3. 2022Joint Device Selection and Power Control for Wireless Federated Learningcited by 20
  4. 2021Federated Learning for Industrial Internet of Things in Future Industriescited by 14

Built on by

Not cited yet.