mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ExCAM: Explainable Cultural Awareness Metrics

arXiv 2605.29897 ↗First posted 28 May 2026cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Evaluating the cultural awareness of large language models is crucial to ensure the fairness of generated text and the generalizability of applications across the world. Recent benchmarks explore cultural goods like food or values like behavior in stressful situations through the lens of question answering or text generation tasks. However, creating these benchmarks requires time-intensive and costly human annotations. Also, benchmarks that evaluate cultural awareness in free text are scarce and often rely on dated evaluation mechanisms. To address this gap, we introduce ExCAM, an Explainable Cultural Awareness Metric, which is, to our knowledge, the first dedicated evaluation metric that identifies, rates and explains cultural errors in instruction-output pairs. To train and evaluate ExCAM, we introduce ExCAM40k, a dataset comprised of nine existing benchmarks that we reformat and enhance with synthetic errors. Compared to several baselines, including GPT-5, ExCAM achieves the highest error detection rate with up to 80% accuracy on a balanced test set. Therefore, ExCAM opens the pathway towards fine-grained and explainable cultural evaluation of free text.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 May 2026.

Builds on

25 of 41 references.

References · 25

  1. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  2. 2024Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model Locally on Your Phonecited by 1,917
  3. 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,033
  4. 2024LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own Generationscited by 686
  5. 2025Phi-4-Mini Technical Report: Compact yet Powerful Multimodal Language Models via Mixture-of-LoRAscited by 521
  6. 2024LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methodscited by 465
  7. 2023Towards Measuring the Representation of Subjective Global Opinions in Language Modelscited by 437
  8. 2023Large Language Models Are State-of-the-Art Evaluators of Translation Qualitycited by 420
  9. 2020Evaluation of Text Generation: A Surveycited by 277
  10. 2024BLEnD: A Benchmark for LLMs on Everyday Knowledge in Diverse Cultures and Languagescited by 173
  11. 2024Towards Measuring and Modeling "Culture" in LLMs: A Surveycited by 167
  12. 2020A Survey of Evaluation Metrics Used for NLG Systemscited by 164
13 more
  1. 2023GEMBA-MQM: Detecting Translation Quality Error Spans with GPT-4cited by 146
  2. 2024VERISCORE: Evaluating the factuality of verifiable claims in long-form text generationcited by 117
  3. 2024Survey of Cultural Awareness in Language Models: Text and Beyondcited by 103
  4. 2024INCLUDE: Evaluating Multilingual Language Understanding with Regional Knowledgecited by 86
  5. 2023Ties Matter: Meta-Evaluating Modern Metrics with Pairwise Accuracy and Tie Calibrationcited by 74
  6. 2024CaLMQA: Exploring culturally specific long-form question answering across 23 languagescited by 31
  7. 2024NativQA: Multilingual Culturally-Aligned Natural Query for LLMscited by 30
  8. 2025An Evaluation of Cultural Value Alignment in LLMcited by 28
  9. 2024Culturally Aware and Adapted NLP: A Taxonomy and a Survey of the State of the Artcited by 26
  10. 2023The Eval4NLP 2023 Shared Task on Prompting Large Language Models as Explainable Metricscited by 23
  11. 2024Cultural Commonsense Knowledge for Intercultural Dialoguescited by 20
  12. 2023Towards Explainable Evaluation Metrics for Machine Translationcited by 15
  13. 2025CURE: Cultural Understanding and Reasoning Evaluation - A Framework for "Thick" Culture Alignment Evaluation in LLMscited by 7

Built on by

Not cited yet.