GUITestScape: Towards Open-set Evaluation on Exploratory GUI Testing
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → GUI and mobile agents
Abstract (arXiv)
Exploratory GUI testing is a particularly demanding setting for MLLM agents: without predefined test scripts, an agent must autonomously navigate an application and discover defects through its own interaction. However, current evaluation falls short on two fronts. First, existing benchmarks focus almost exclusively on interaction defects, leaving display defects outside the evaluation frame. Second, evaluation protocols are bound to predefined defect annotations, collapsing the testing process into a single end-state judgment that conflates qualitatively distinct failure modes. To address these challenges, we present GUITestScape, an interactive benchmark covering 61 real-world Android applications and 508 preset defects spanning interaction and display types, and introduce GUIJudge, an open-set evaluator that decomposes an agent's testing trajectory into independently diagnosable capabilities. Experimental results demonstrate that GUIJudge achieves reliable process-aware evaluation beyond predefined annotations, substantially outperforming all baselines. Benchmarking on GUITestScape further reveals that detection remains the critical bottleneck for existing models across both defect types, and that integrating GUIJudge's verifiers into existing agents significantly boosts their detection performance without retraining.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in GUI and mobile agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 14 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 May 2026.
Builds on
14 of 22 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2026GUITester: Enabling GUI Agents for Exploratory Defect Discovery8 Jan
- 2024GUI Testing Arena: A Unified Benchmark for Advancing Autonomous GUI Testing Agent24 Dec
- 2024OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environments11 Apr
Other references · 11
- 2023WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agentscited by 1,908
- 2023Mind2Web: Towards a Generalist Agent for the Webcited by 1,210
- 2024AndroidWorld: A Dynamic Benchmarking Environment for Autonomous Agentscited by 450
- 2025Beyond Binary Rewards: Training LMs to Reason About Their Uncertaintycited by 107
- 2025AgentRewardBench: Evaluating Automatic Evaluations of Web Agent Trajectoriescited by 99
- 2020Owl Eyes: Spotting UI Display Issues via Visual Understandingcited by 16
- 2015Automated Test Input Generation for Android: Are We There Yet?cited by 10
- 2022Nighthawk: Fully Automated Localizing UI Display Issues via Visual Understandingcited by 6
- 2025Scenario-Guided LLM-based Mobile App GUI Testingcited by 4
- 2025Navigating the growing field of research on AI for software testing -- the taxonomy for AI-augmented software testing and an ontology-driven literature surveycited by 2
- 2021An Empirical Analysis of UI-based Flaky Testscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026GUITAR: Structured Failure Diagnosis of GUI Agents via State Transitions
- 2025ReuseDroid: A VLM-empowered Android UI Test Migrator Boosted by Active Feedback
- 2026AndroidDaily: A Verifiable Benchmark for Mobile GUI Agents on Real-World Closed-Source Applications
- 2025ProBench: Benchmarking GUI Agents with Accurate Process Information
- 2026ClawGUI: A Unified Framework for Training, Evaluating, and Deploying GUI Agents
- 2025GUI-Robust: A Comprehensive Dataset for Testing GUI Agent Robustness in Real-World Anomalies
- 2026Same Tasks, Different Apps: Why Mobile GUI Agents Fail to Generalize?
- 2026CovAgent: Overcoming the 30% Curse of Mobile Application Coverage with Agentic AI and Dynamic Instrumentation