Harmonizing Real-Time Constraints and Long-Horizon Reasoning: An Asynchronous Agentic Framework for Dynamic Scheduling
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
The Dynamic Flexible Job Shop Scheduling Problem (DFJSP) necessitates a trade-off between instant reaction to stochastic disturbances and global optimization of production goals. Conventional priority rules are insufficiently flexible to handle complex disruptions, whereas learning-based approaches often compromise interpretability or fail to generalize across problem scales. Although Large Language Models (LLMs) offer advanced reasoning capabilities to bridge this gap, their substantial inference latency is incompatible with the millisecond-level decision cycles of industrial control systems. To resolve this conflict, we introduce RACE-Sched, an asynchronous agent-based framework that decouples policy execution from logical reasoning via a dual-stream architecture. The Reactive Stream executes low-latency symbolic heuristics to enable real-time dispatching, while the parallel Deliberative Stream leverages an LLM to synthesize, validate, and evolve these rules. Candidate rules undergo rigorous testing in a sandbox and are deployed via atomic updates, ensuring safety without blocking the control loop. Additionally, a semantic rule repository indexes validated heuristics for retrieval-based initialization which enhances transferability across problem scales. Extensive evaluations on GEN-Bench, MK-Bench, and JMS-Bench demonstrate that RACE-Sched outperforms leading Deep Reinforcement Learning and other LLM-based baselines. This approach harmonizes real-time constraints with long-horizon reasoning to achieve superior solution quality and robust adaptation to dynamic events.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 8 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 May 2026.
Builds on
8 of 35 references.
References · 8
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,467
- 2025OpenAI GPT-5 System Cardcited by 910
- 2025DeepSeek-V3.2: Pushing the Frontier of Open Large Language Modelscited by 755
- 2024DeepSeek-V3 Technical Reportcited by 724
- 2025A Survey of Self-Evolving Agents: What, When, How, and Where to Evolve on the Path to Artificial Super Intelligencecited by 155
- 2025ReflecSched: Solving Dynamic Flexible Job-Shop Scheduling via LLM-Powered Hierarchical Reflectioncited by 5
- 2025Exploring the Dynamic Scheduling Space of Real-Time Generative AI Applications on Emerging Heterogeneous Systemscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026DScheLLM: Enabling Dynamic Scheduling through a Fine-Tuned Dual-System Large language Model
- 2026DynaSchedBench: Calibrated Dynamic Scheduling Benchmarks and Observability Paradox in LLM-based Scheduling Agents
- 2026AssemPlanner: A Multi-Agent Based Task Planning Framework for Flexible Assembly System ↗
- 2026From Agent Loops to Structured Graphs:A Scheduler-Theoretic Framework for LLM Agent Execution
- 2026Agentic AI-Assisted Modeling for Production Scheduling: Assessment in Constraint Programming
- 2025Gradientsys: A Multi-Agent LLM Scheduler with ReAct Orchestration
- 2026TRACE: Tackling Real-World Resource Assignment Problems via Agentic Heuristic Design
- 2025Real-Time Reasoning Agents in Evolving Environments