TRACE: Tackling Real-World Resource Assignment Problems via Agentic Heuristic Design
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents
Abstract (arXiv)
Dynamic resource assignment, the real-time allocation of task streams to heterogeneous processing nodes, is the backbone of modern computing infrastructure. While learning-based schedulers excel in research, industrial deployments still rely on hand-written rules that operators can read, audit, and execute within tight latency budgets. LLM-based Automatic Heuristic Design (AHD) promises to automate writing such rules. However, existing AHD frameworks were developed for combinatorial problems fully specified to the LLM, and they learn only from a scalar fitness score. In real systems, the behaviour that determines a good heuristic, such as processor speeds or power consumption, is unknown a priori: the score reveals which heuristic performs better, but not why. This missing information is recorded in the system logs that every evaluation produces. Exploiting it is non-trivial: logs are massive and noisy, the relevant signals depend on the objective, and their content and format vary across hardware and software stacks, so they can neither be fed to an LLM as is nor processed by a fixed parser. We propose TRACE, which couples an evolutionary AHD loop with an agentic knowledge-extraction workflow. A Reasoner agent analyzes the log schema in light of the objective and formulates hypotheses about the system dynamics; a Coder agent writes and executes schema-specific code to test them, producing insights or executable tools for the evolved heuristics. We evaluate TRACE on a synthetic cloud benchmark and a 5G vRAN scenario built from industrial testbed measurements and operational traffic traces. TRACE consistently outperforms state-of-the-art AHD methods in resource assignment problems and yields more auditable heuristics at under 2% overhead.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 6 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2026.
Builds on
6 of 42 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 5
- 2024Evolution of Heuristics: Towards Efficient Automatic Algorithm Design Using Large Language Modelcited by 258
- 2025CALM: Co-evolution of Algorithms and Language Model for Automatic Heuristic Designcited by 28
- 2025Multimodal LLM-assisted Evolutionary Search for Programmatic Control Policiescited by 8
- 2025DHEvo: Data-Algorithm Based Heuristic Evolution for Generalizable MILP Solvingcited by 4
- 2026Automated Heuristic Design for Network Operationscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Self-Resource Allocation in Multi-Agent LLM Systems
- 2026PathWise: Planning through World Model for Automated Heuristic Design via Self-Evolving LLMs
- 2026SimpleEvol: An Agent-Loop Framework for LLM-Driven Automated Heuristic Design with Minimal Human Priors
- 2025HeuriGym: An Agentic Benchmark for LLM-Crafted Heuristics in Combinatorial Optimization
- 2026PeakBench: Benchmarking Resource-Aware Tool Invocation in LLM Agents
- 2026Compute Allocation for Self-Evolving LLMs: From Depth-Breadth to Multi-Armed Bandits
- 2026OR-Agent: Bridging Evolutionary Search and Structured Research for Automated Heuristic Design
- 2026From Agent Loops to Structured Graphs:A Scheduler-Theoretic Framework for LLM Agent Execution