Detectability in Diversity: Improved Canary Crafting for Privacy Auditing in One Run
On the map: LLM safety and security → Membership inference attacks
Abstract (arXiv)
Privacy auditing aims to empirically assess privacy leakage in machine learning models using membership inference attacks (MIAs), and to derive lower bounds on differential privacy (DP) parameters. Standard privacy auditing inserts a sensitive sample (a canary) into many (gg 100) randomized training runs, requiring the auditor to detect whether it was included in each run. In one-run auditing, many canaries are included in a single training run, avoiding the high computational cost of multi-run approaches. However, recent theory shows that canaries can interfere with one another, reducing per-canary MIA scores and thereby weakening the audit power. We propose IBIS, a framework that optimizes canaries to maximize their own score while minimizing their impact on others. IBIS combines influence-based greedy initialization with bilevel optimization, introducing a novel regularization term that encourages canaries to be orthogonal in embedding space as a proxy for reducing interference. We propose an efficient bilevel algorithm that incrementally updates a single model at each canary update, avoiding the need to retrain the model from scratch after every update. Experiments show that IBIS offers a better performance-cost trade-off than existing canary crafting approaches, improving MIA metrics while reducing computational cost by up to two orders of magnitude.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Membership inference attacks, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 41 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 May 2026.
Builds on
41 of 56 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2026Causal Evaluation of Membership Inference Attacks2 Feb
- 2025Optimizing Canaries for Privacy Auditing with Metagradient Descent21 Jul
- 2023Low-Cost High-Power Membership Inference Attacks6 Dec
- 2021Membership Inference Attacks From First Principles7 Dec
Other references · 37
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
- 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,189
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
- 2018The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural Networkscited by 864
- 2015Optimizing Neural Networks with Kronecker-factored Approximate Curvaturecited by 796
- 2013Stochastic First- and Zeroth-order Methods for Nonconvex Stochastic Programmingcited by 724
- 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 650
- 2020What Neural Networks Memorize and Why: Discovering the Long Tail via Influence Estimationcited by 497
- 2023Scalable Extraction of Training Data from (Production) Language Modelscited by 434
25 more
- 2021Opacus: User-Friendly Differential Privacy Library in PyTorchcited by 383
- 2015Gradient-based Hyperparameter Optimization through Reversible Learningcited by 360
- 2023Studying Large Language Model Generalization with Influence Functionscited by 326
- 2018Approximation Methods for Bilevel Programmingcited by 236
- 2016Hyperparameter optimization with approximate gradientcited by 233
- 2020Bilevel Optimization: Convergence Analysis and Enhanced Designcited by 222
- 2020Auditing Differentially Private Machine Learning: How Private is Private SGD?cited by 218
- 2021Adversary Instantiation: Lower Bounds for Differentially Private Machine Learningcited by 199
- 2021Numerical Composition of Differential Privacycited by 180
- 2022If Influence Functions are the Answer, Then What is the Question?cited by 144
- 2022Reconstructing Training Data from Trained Neural Networkscited by 133
- 2023Privacy Auditing with One (1) Training Runcited by 123
- 2022A framework for bilevel optimization that enables stochastic and global variance reduction algorithmscited by 99
- 2021Amortized Implicit Differentiation for Stochastic Bilevel Optimizationcited by 63
- 2022Connect the Dots: Tighter Discrete Approximations of Privacy Loss Distributionscited by 52
- 2018Detecting Violations of Differential Privacycited by 39
- 2024Auditing f-Differential Privacy in One Runcited by 30
- 2023One-step differentiation of iterative algorithmscited by 28
- 2022A General Framework for Auditing Differentially Private Machine Learningcited by 25
- 2022CANIFE: Crafting Canaries for Empirical Privacy Measurement in Federated Learningcited by 24
- 2024Tighter Privacy Auditing of DP-SGD in the Hidden State Threat Modelcited by 18
- 2023Adaptive Training Distributions with Scalable Online Bilevel Optimizationcited by 11
- 2025Privacy Audit as Bits Transmission: (Im)possibilities for Audit by One Runcited by 10
- 2025How Well Can Differential Privacy Be Audited in One Run?cited by 9
- 2025Extracting alignment data in open modelscited by 8
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025PrivacyGuard: A Modular Framework for Privacy Auditing in Machine Learning
- 2026Advancing the State-of-the-Art in Empirical Privacy Auditing
- 2025Observational Auditing of Label Privacy
- 2025On the Fairness of Privacy Protection: Measuring and Mitigating the Disparity of Group Privacy Risks for Differentially Private Machine Learning
- 2023Epsilon*: Privacy Metric for Machine Learning Models
- 2025Privacy Auditing of Large Language Models
- 2025Enhancing One-run Privacy Auditing with Quantile Regression-Based Membership Inference
- 2026Revisiting the Provable-Auditable Privacy Gap of DP-SGD