mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Epsilon*: Privacy Metric for Machine Learning Models

arXiv 2307.11280 ↗First posted 21 Jul 2023cs.LG cs.CR cs.DScited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce Epsilon*, a new privacy metric for measuring the privacy risk of a single model instance prior to, during, or after deployment of privacy mitigation strategies. The metric requires only black-box access to model predictions, does not require training data re-sampling or model re-training, and can be used to measure the privacy risk of models not trained with differential privacy. Epsilon* is a function of true positive and false positive rates in a hypothesis test used by an adversary in a membership inference attack. We distinguish between quantifying the privacy loss of a trained model instance, which we refer to as empirical privacy, and quantifying the privacy loss of the training mechanism which produces this model instance. Existing approaches in the privacy auditing literature provide lower bounds for the latter, while our metric provides an empirical lower bound for the former by relying on an (ε, δ)-type of quantification of the privacy of the trained model instance. We establish a relationship between these lower bounds and show how to implement Epsilon* to avoid numerical and noise amplification instability. We further show in experiments on benchmark public data sets that Epsilon* is sensitive to privacy risk mitigation by training with differential privacy (DP), where the value of Epsilon* is reduced by up to 800% compared to the Epsilon* values of non-DP trained baseline models. This metric allows privacy auditors to be independent of model owners, and enables visualizing the privacy-utility landscape to make informed decisions regarding the trade-offs between model privacy and utility.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jul 2023.

Builds on

16 of 49 references.

References · 16

  1. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
  2. 2021Membership Inference Attacks From First Principlescited by 839
  3. 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 643
  4. 2018ML-Leaks: Model and Data Independent Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses on Machine Learning Modelscited by 475
  5. 2013The Composition Theorem for Differential Privacycited by 290
  6. 2020Auditing Differentially Private Machine Learning: How Private is Private SGD?cited by 213
  7. 2021Adversary Instantiation: Lower Bounds for Differentially Private Machine Learningcited by 193
  8. 2023How to DP-fy ML: A Practical Guide to Machine Learning with Differential Privacycited by 150
  9. 2023Privacy Auditing with One (1) Training Runcited by 119
  10. 2020Revisiting Membership Inference Under Realistic Assumptionscited by 108
  11. 2022Debugging Differential Privacy: A Case Study for Privacy Auditingcited by 39
  12. 2018Detecting Violations of Differential Privacycited by 37
4 more
  1. 2023One-shot Empirical Privacy Estimation for Federated Learningcited by 35
  2. 2022A General Framework for Auditing Differentially Private Machine Learningcited by 25
  3. 2022CANIFE: Crafting Canaries for Empirical Privacy Measurement in Federated Learningcited by 24
  4. 2022Private Ad Modeling with DP-SGDcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.