Symbolic Regression via Latent Iterative Refinement
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Symbolic regression (SR) seeks closed-form mathematical expressions that fit observed data. Neural SR methods amortize the search by training an encoder to map observations directly to expressions in a single pass, but this amortized inference leaves a residual amortization gap between its one-shot prediction and the true posterior. We propose Latent Equation Embedding (LEE), a framework that closes this gap through iterative amortized inference in a functionally grounded latent space. LEE learns a shared latent space Z equipped with three components: an encoder f_theta that jointly embeds symbolic tokens and numerical observations into a single latent vector z; an expression decoder g_expr that reconstructs formulas from z; and an evaluation decoder g_eval that predicts function values from z, explicitly grounding the latent space in functional behavior. At inference, LEE performs iterative refinement by re-encoding decoded expressions jointly with observations, progressively improving the latent estimate. LEE uses the encoder itself as a learned inference optimizer: each re-encoding step implicitly computes the mismatch between the candidate and the data. Because g_eval is differentiable in z, we additionally interleave continuous gradient descent with discrete re-encoding, yielding a hybrid iterative and gradient refinement procedure. On SRBench across three noise levels, against 19 baselines spanning genetic programming, symbolic-neural hybrids, and pre-trained Transformers, LEE produces expressions 2--10x simpler than the strongest accuracy-oriented baselines, including Operon, GP-GOMEA, TPSR, RAG-SR, and GenSR, with complexity 8--11 versus 20--90. These results advance the low-complexity region of the accuracy-complexity Pareto frontier and show graceful degradation as noise increases.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 May 2026.
Builds on
13 of 27 references.
References · 13
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
- 2017Neural Discrete Representation Learningcited by 4,712
- 2019AI Feynman: a Physics-Inspired Method for Symbolic Regressioncited by 548
- 2019Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradientscited by 309
- 2019Deep Learning for Symbolic Mathematicscited by 270
- 2021Contemporary Symbolic Regression Methods and their Relative Performancecited by 215
- 2022End-to-end symbolic regression with transformerscited by 203
- 2021Neural Symbolic Regression that Scalescited by 192
- 2018Iterative Amortized Inferencecited by 94
- 2023Transformer-based Planning for Symbolic Regressioncited by 79
- 2023SNIP: Bridging Mathematical Symbolic and Numeric Realms with Unified Pre-trainingcited by 47
1 more
Built on by
Not cited yet.