mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ExTax: Explainable Disinformation Detection via Persuasion, Emotion, and Narrative Role Taxonomies

arXiv 2605.27045 ↗First posted 26 May 2026cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The democratization of LLMs has accelerated the generation and circulation of highly fluent disinformation, making traditional syntax-semantic verification increasingly insufficient. Such deception rarely relies solely on surface-level falsity; instead, it often combines persuasive rhetoric, emotional manipulation, and narrative role construction to influence readers' interpretations through multiple cognitive pathways. However, existing detectors typically emphasize isolated signals -- such as syntax, external knowledge, persuasion, or affective cues -- and therefore struggle to capture the multi-faceted manipulative intents underlying disinformation or provide human-auditable explanations. To address this gap, we present ExTax, a taxonomy-aligned framework for explainable disinformation detection. ExTax unifies persuasive rhetoric, emotional manipulation, and narrative roles into a 17-dimensional taxonomic space, covering 6 persuasive-rhetoric strategies, 5 emotional-manipulation methods, and 6 narrative-role categories. It elicits attributes from multiple frontier LLMs, reconciles their disagreements through Entropy-driven Dynamic Label Smoothing, and fuses the resulting taxonomic representations with contextual encodings via Heterogeneous Multi-Head Attention, grounding each prediction in an interpretable manipulation profile. Across five cross-domain and cross-genre benchmarks, ExTax achieves an overall Macro F1 of 0.8456, outperforming state-of-the-art deep learning and LLM-based baselines. It also remains robust under severe genre imbalance, where the strongest deep baseline degrades from 0.9454 to 0.6194.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 May 2026.

Builds on

14 of 41 references.

References · 14

  1. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  2. 2023A Multitask, Multilingual, Multimodal Evaluation of ChatGPT on Reasoning, Hallucination, and Interactivitycited by 894
  3. 2020CoAID: COVID-19 Healthcare Misinformation Datasetcited by 84
  4. 2023Towards Reliable Misinformation Mitigation: Generalization, Uncertainty, and GPT-4cited by 45
  5. 2022Crowdsourced Fact-Checking at Twitter: How Does the Crowd Compare With Experts?cited by 16
  6. 2021Cross-SEAN: A Cross-Stitch Semi-Supervised Neural Attention Model for COVID-19 Fake News Detectioncited by 15
  7. 2024RAEmoLLM: Retrieval Augmented LLMs for Cross-Domain Misinformation Detection Using In-Context Learning Based on Emotional Informationcited by 14
  8. 2025PCoT: Persuasion-Augmented Chain of Thought for Detecting Fake News and Social Media Disinformationcited by 11
  9. 2026Industrialized Deception: The Collateral Effects of LLM-Generated Misinformation on Digital Ecosystemscited by 7
  10. 2022Using Persuasive Writing Strategies to Explain and Detect Health Misinformationcited by 6
  11. 2025Entity Framing and Role Portrayal in the Newscited by 6
  12. 2021Combining exogenous and endogenous signals with a semi-supervised co-attention network for early detection of COVID-19 fake tweetscited by 5
2 more
  1. 2024Mitigating Biases of Large Language Models in Stance Detection with Counterfactual Augmented Calibrationcited by 5
  2. 2025DRES: Fake news detection by dynamic representation and ensemble selectioncited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.