mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning to Adapt SFT Data for Better Reasoning Generalization

arXiv 2605.26924 ↗First posted 26 May 2026cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable progress, with post-training playing a crucial role in enhancing their reasoning capabilities. Among post-training paradigms, supervised fine-tuning (SFT) is widely used: it leverages external data to provide dense supervision and enables efficient training. However, directly fine-tuning on expert data can hurt generalization when the data distribution is mismatched with the target model's own distribution. In this work, we propose Data Adaptation for Reasoning Tuning (DART), which formulates the use of a fixed, potentially distributionally misaligned SFT dataset as an optimization problem over demonstration transformations. DART trains a mapper model with reinforcement learning to convert original SFT data into model-adapted supervision that better matches the target model's distribution and learning preferences. The transformed data are then used for SFT, allowing the target model to better exploit external supervision. Experiments across multiple models and datasets show that DART improves generalization, achieves higher training efficiency than direct RL, and helps models surpass standard SFT. Our code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/DART525E50D.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 29 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 May 2026.

Builds on

29 of 46 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026A Relative-Budget Theory for Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards in Large Language Model Reasoning2 Feb
  2. 2025SimpleTIR: End-to-End Reinforcement Learning for Multi-Turn Tool-Integrated Reasoning2 Sep
  3. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning22 Jan

Other references · 26

  1. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  2. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  3. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
  4. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
  5. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
  6. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
  7. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,637
  8. 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,807
  9. 2025Search-R1: Training LLMs to Reason and Leverage Search Engines with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,444
  10. 2021Are NLP Models really able to Solve Simple Math Word Problems?cited by 878
  11. 2024DeepSeek-V3 Technical Reportcited by 811
  12. 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 532
14 more
  1. 2026Kimi K2.5: Visual Agentic Intelligencecited by 501
  2. 2022Language Models Are Greedy Reasoners: A Systematic Formal Analysis of Chain-of-Thoughtcited by 337
  3. 2025rStar-Math: Small LLMs Can Master Math Reasoning with Self-Evolved Deep Thinkingcited by 313
  4. 2025OpenThoughts: Data Recipes for Reasoning Modelscited by 304
  5. 2024ReFT: Reasoning with Reinforced Fine-Tuningcited by 239
  6. 2025RL's Razor: Why Online Reinforcement Learning Forgets Lesscited by 176
  7. 2025OpenCodeReasoning: Advancing Data Distillation for Competitive Codingcited by 113
  8. 2025The Invisible Leash: Why RLVR May or May Not Escape Its Origincited by 97
  9. 2025D3: Diversity, Difficulty, and Dependability-Aware Data Selection for Sample-Efficient LLM Instruction Tuningcited by 21
  10. 2024Understanding the Effect of Noise in LLM Training Data with Algorithmic Chains of Thoughtcited by 19
  11. 2026Adaptive Rollout Allocation for Online Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewardscited by 17
  12. 2026How to Fine-Tune a Reasoning Model? A Teacher-Student Cooperation Framework to Synthesize Student-Consistent SFT Datacited by 8
  13. 2025CoT-Evo: Evolutionary Distillation of Chain-of-Thought for Scientific Reasoningcited by 5
  14. 2026TAMTRL: Teacher-Aligned Reward Reshaping for Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learning in Long-Context Compressioncited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Enhancing Large Language Model Reasoning via Selective Critical Token Fine-Tuning
  2. 2026Theoretical Perspectives on Data Quality and Synergistic Effects in Pre- and Post-Training Reasoning Models
  3. 2025UFT: Unifying Supervised and Reinforcement Fine-Tuning
  4. 2025SRFT: A Single-Stage Method with Supervised and Reinforcement Fine-Tuning for Reasoning
  5. 2026What Should SFT Learn? Conditional Information Gain for Generalizable Post-Training
  6. 2025Beyond Templates: Dynamic Adaptation of Reasoning Demonstrations via Feasibility-Aware Exploration
  7. 2025On the Generalization of SFT: A Reinforcement Learning Perspective with Reward Rectification
  8. 2025Scalpel vs. Hammer: GRPO Amplifies Existing Capabilities, SFT Replaces Them