AgentSociety: Incentivizing Agentic Social Intelligence
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Social simulation and multi-agent debate
Abstract (arXiv)
The success of deployed agents relies on their ability to handle open-ended user requests using their inherent capabilities, not only in solving requests directly but also in effectively leveraging inter-agent communication channels and feedback signals over time. This requires a multi-agent environment where agents can operate autonomously, strategically communicate, behave collaboratively and be driven by economic incentives, much like humans in society. Towards this vision, we propose mathttAgentSociety, a mechanism that enables decentralized agentic collaboration grounded in liquid democracy and information diffusion from social choice theory. We show that mathttAgentSociety provides an environment for agents to make autonomous decisions utilizing their local context to maximize their utility while achieving collective outcomes through incentivized collaboration. Specifically, we prove that delegation to more competent neighbor agents is incentive compatible and naturally generates multi-agent routing path by consensus. Additionally, our mechanism incentivizes agents to selectively disclose information to their neighbor agents when doing so aligns with their self-interest, so as to garner influence. We characterize the Nash equilibrium showing that agent payoffs are reflective of their marginal contributions. We compare and benchmark strategy profiles adopted by open and proprietary state-of-the-art language models deployed in mathttAgentSociety against best response. Finally, we evaluate collaborative performance from consensus-based routing among self-interested heterogeneous agents in mathttAgentSociety on real-world datasets.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Social simulation and multi-agent debate, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 12 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 May 2026.
Builds on
12 of 43 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2026Social Theory Should Be a Structural Prior for Agentic AI: A Formal Framework for Multi-Agent Social Systems8 May
- 2025From Debate to Equilibrium: Belief-Driven Multi-Agent LLM Reasoning via Bayesian Nash Equilibrium9 Jun
- 2024Cooperate or Collapse: Emergence of Sustainable Cooperation in a Society of LLM Agents25 Apr
Other references · 9
- 2024AFlow: Automating Agentic Workflow Generationcited by 395
- 2025Multi-agent Architecture Search via Agentic Supernetcited by 164
- 2024Cut the Crap: An Economical Communication Pipeline for LLM-based Multi-Agent Systemscited by 129
- 2024G-Designer: Architecting Multi-agent Communication Topologies via Graph Neural Networkscited by 110
- 2024Mastering Board Games by External and Internal Planning with Language Modelscited by 27
- 2025Pok'eChamp: an Expert-level Minimax Language Agentcited by 16
- 2018The Fluid Mechanics of Liquid Democracycited by 10
- 2025Do Large Language Models Know What They Are Capable Of?cited by 9
- 2017Mechanism Design in Social Networkscited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Economy of Minds: Emerging Multi-Agent Intelligence with Economic Interactions
- 2026Agentic Societies Need a Social Harness
- 2026Mechanism Design Is Not Enough: Prosocial Agents for Cooperative AI
- 2026Talk, Judge, Cooperate: Gossip-Driven Indirect Reciprocity in Self-Interested LLM Agents
- 2024Multi-Agent, Human-Agent and Beyond: A Survey on Cooperation in Social Dilemmas
- 2025Agentic Inequality
- 2024AdaSociety: An Adaptive Environment with Social Structures for Multi-Agent Decision-Making
- 2026Physics of Agents: Statistical Mechanics Predicts Collective Behavior of AI Agents