TIAR: Trajectory-Informed Advantage Reweighting for LLM Abstention Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper investigates large language model (LLM) abstention learning, specifically using ternary reward, which incentivize truthfulness in large language models. This paper extends that idea by moving from a ternary reward to a Trajectory-Informed advantage reweighting, dynamically re-weights the abstention reward during Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) training. The objective of this work focuses on abstention learning instead of improving truthfulness, serving as an exploration into hallucination reduction. The novelty of this paper lies in methodological innovation, advantage re-weighting, and benchmark selection. Leveraging GRPO's multiple trajectories as a natural abstention signal, this method uses a reward signal to explore knowledge boundaries and encourage consistency. By demonstrating that trajectories can be used as a confidence indicator of the policy relative to the query, they are then used to dynamically calculate the abstention advantage. AbstentionBench is used as the evaluation benchmark, as this work aims to contribute to the field of abstention learning. All datasets on the benchmark were tested against this method and various baselines. Empirical results demonstrate that TIAR achieves state-of-the-art abstention F1 scores across five of six evaluation categories, outperforming the static ternary baseline on 17 of 31 benchmark datasets while fully preserving baseline accuracy.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 May 2026.
Builds on
14 of 26 references.
References · 14
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
- 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 1,980
- 2022Teaching Models to Express Their Uncertainty in Wordscited by 731
- 2023LLM Self Defense: By Self Examination, LLMs Know They Are Being Trickedcited by 226
- 2025AbstentionBench: Reasoning LLMs Fail on Unanswerable Questionscited by 129
- 2024I Don't Know: Explicit Modeling of Uncertainty with an [IDK] Tokencited by 26
- 2025Mitigating LLM Hallucination via Behaviorally Calibrated Reinforcement Learningcited by 13
- 2024Mitigating Hallucination in Abstractive Summarization with Domain-Conditional Mutual Informationcited by 6
- 2026QuantLRM: Quantization of Large Reasoning Models via Fine-Tuning Signalscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025AAPO: Enhancing the Reasoning Capabilities of LLMs with Advantage Margin
- 2026Advantage Collapse in Group Relative Policy Optimization: Diagnosis and Mitigation
- 2026Range-GRPO: Policy Optimization via Pairwise Relations among Reward Intervals
- 2026GVPO++: Group Variance Policy Optimization for LLM Post-Training and On-Policy Distillation
- 2025NGRPO: Negative-enhanced Group Relative Policy Optimization
- 2025Mitigating Think-Answer Mismatch in LLM Reasoning Through Noise-Aware Advantage Reweighting
- 2025EDGE-GRPO: Entropy-Driven GRPO with Guided Error Correction for Advantage Diversity
- 2026Back to Basics: Revisiting Exploration in Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning via Generative Probabilities