mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

When Agents Control Robots: A Zero Trust Policy Model for Agentic Cyber-Physical Systems

arXiv 2605.25653 ↗First posted 25 May 2026cs.DC cs.MAcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

Multi-agent systems powered by large foundation models (LFMs) are increasingly deployed to control industrial robots through natural language, creating deployments in which security failures produce physical consequences. We analyse this threat landscape through Cobot-Claw, a deployed four-agent system for UR3e robotic arm control, and identify five attack classes specific to agentic cyber-physical systems. We propose ZTPM, a Zero Trust Policy Model comprising 25 typed primitives across five enforcement domains with Physical Impact Tiers as a runtime policy dimension. An empirical evaluation across 60 execution traces on two LFM backends provides initial evidence that actuation parameter selection is model-dependent and non-deterministic, motivating the need for policy-level enforcement at the physical actuation boundary.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 3 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 May 2026.

Builds on

3 of 19 references.

References · 3

  1. 2023RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Controlcited by 2,993
  2. 2023NeMo Guardrails: A Toolkit for Controllable and Safe LLM Applications with Programmable Railscited by 347
  3. 2025Towards Robust and Secure Embodied AI: A Survey on Vulnerabilities and Attackscited by 32

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Trustworthy Agentic AI: A Comprehensive Cybersecurity and Systems Survey on Threat Landscapes, Defense Architectures, and Open Challenges
  2. 2025Trust in LLM-controlled Robotics: a Survey of Security Threats, Defenses and Challenges
  3. 2026Agentic-ZTA: A Multi-Agent Architecture for Autonomous Zero Trust Enforcement
  4. 2026Uncovering Security Threats and Architecting Defenses in Autonomous Agents: A Case Study of OpenClaw
  5. 2025Systems Security Foundations for Agentic Computing
  6. 2026Environment-Grounded Multi-Agent Workflow for Autonomous Penetration Testing
  7. 2026ClawLess: A Security Model of AI Agents
  8. 2026Propagating Unsafe Actions in LLM Controlled Multi-Robot Collaboration via Single Robot Compromise