mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Environment-Grounded Multi-Agent Workflow for Autonomous Penetration Testing

arXiv 2603.24221 ↗First posted 25 Mar 2026cs.RO cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

The increasing complexity and interconnectivity of digital infrastructures make scalable and reliable security assessment methods essential. Robotic systems represent a particularly important class of operational technology, as modern robots are highly networked cyber-physical systems deployed in domains such as industrial automation, logistics, and autonomous services. This paper explores the use of large language models for automated penetration testing in robotic environments. We propose an environment-grounded multi-agent architecture tailored to Robotics-based systems. The approach dynamically constructs a shared graph-based memory during execution that captures the observable system state, including network topology, communication channels, vulnerabilities, and attempted exploits. This enables structured automation while maintaining traceability and effective context management throughout the testing process. Evaluated across multiple iterations within a specialized robotics Capture-the-Flag scenario (ROS/ROS2), the system demonstrated high reliability, successfully completing the challenge in 100% of test runs (n=5). This performance significantly exceeds literature benchmarks while maintaining the traceability and human oversight required by frameworks like the EU AI Act.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 9 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Mar 2026.

Builds on

9 of 20 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024HackSynth: LLM Agent and Evaluation Framework for Autonomous Penetration Testing2 Dec

Other references · 8

  1. 2025Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail?cited by 559
  2. 2023PentestGPT: An LLM-empowered Automatic Penetration Testing Toolcited by 94
  3. 2024AutoAttacker: A Large Language Model Guided System to Implement Automatic Cyber-attackscited by 94
  4. 2023Getting pwn'd by AI: Penetration Testing with Large Language Modelscited by 82
  5. 2020Cybersecurity for Industrial Control Systems: A Surveycited by 12
  6. 2024Towards Automated Penetration Testing: Introducing LLM Benchmark, Analysis, and Improvementscited by 11
  7. 2024Hacking, The Lazy Way: LLM Augmented Pentestingcited by 5
  8. 2025SoK: Cybersecurity Assessment of Humanoid Ecosystemcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025VulnBot: Autonomous Penetration Testing for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework
  2. 2025xOffense: An Autonomous Multi-Agent Framework for Penetration Testing with Domain-Adapted Large Language Models
  3. 2026Toward Secure AI-Powered Penetration Testing Agents: Security Threats, Guardrails, and Architectural Perspectives
  4. 2025PentestMCP: A Toolkit for Agentic Penetration Testing
  5. 2024AutoPenBench: Benchmarking Generative Agents for Penetration Testing
  6. 2026APT-Agent: Automated Penetration Testing using Large Language Models
  7. 2026AgentWard: A Lifecycle Security Architecture for Autonomous AI Agents
  8. 2026From Capability to Assurance in Autonomous Penetration-Testing Harnesses: A Framework and Reference Implementation