mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Representation-Guided Discrete Molecular Graph Retrosynthesis

arXiv 2605.24428 ↗First posted 23 May 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Stochastic process-based molecular graph generators have become the state of the art for template-free single-step retrosynthesis. However, these models are typically trained only on product-reactant pairs, thereby acquiring chemistry-relevant representations in an indirect and implicit manner. Meanwhile, recent advances in computer vision demonstrate that offering representation guidance to a generator can effectively distill semantics from pretrained encoders into DiTs, substantially improving both convergence and generation quality. Whether similar gains extend to the retrosynthesis task, and what graph-specific design choices can make them work, remains an open question. To address these questions, we conduct a systematic empirical study over a unified design space spanning teacher molecular representations, endpoint and granularity choices, injection depths in the denoiser, correspondence strategies and guidance scheme. Guided by these considerations, we develop Graph-oriented Representation Guidance (GRG), which achieves 58.6 / 77.2 / 83.4 / 87.1 top-1 / 3 / 5 / 10 accuracy on USPTO-50k, while increasing diversity to 15.5, both substantially outperforming the adopted base generator. Notably, GRG consistently improves all top-k metrics in out-of-distribution settings, suggesting that representation guidance facilitates the acquisition of intrinsic chemical semantics. Meanwhile, the introduced representation guidance reduces the number of epochs by 35% and the wall-clock time by 30% to reach comparable performance. In addition, we introduce a simple yet effective representation-similarity-based reranking mechanism, which further improves the top of the ranked list without training an additional verifier.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 May 2026.

Builds on

19 of 36 references.

References · 19

  1. 2015Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamicscited by 7,005
  2. 2022Scalable Diffusion Models with Transformerscited by 5,931
  3. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,355
  4. 2016Instance Normalization: The Missing Ingredient for Fast Stylizationcited by 1,187
  5. 2022DiGress: Discrete Denoising diffusion for graph generationcited by 503
  6. 2018Molecular Transformer - A Model for Uncertainty-Calibrated Chemical Reaction Predictioncited by 225
  7. 2017Learning to Plan Chemical Synthesescited by 175
  8. 2020Retrosynthesis Prediction with Conditional Graph Logic Networkcited by 103
  9. 2020Molecule Edit Graph Attention Network: Modeling Chemical Reactions as Sequences of Graph Editscited by 87
  10. 2020A Graph to Graphs Framework for Retrosynthesis Predictioncited by 85
  11. 2025What matters for Representation Alignment: Global Information or Spatial Structure?cited by 76
  12. 2020RetroXpert: Decompose Retrosynthesis Prediction like a Chemistcited by 66
7 more
  1. 2021Permutation invariant graph-to-sequence model for template-free retrosynthesis and reaction predictioncited by 66
  2. 2020Learning Graph Models for Retrosynthesis Predictioncited by 64
  3. 2023RetroBridge: Modeling Retrosynthesis with Markov Bridgescited by 35
  4. 2021Relative Molecule Self-Attention Transformercited by 21
  5. 2023RetroDiff: Retrosynthesis as Multi-stage Distribution Interpolationcited by 7
  6. 2024Equivariant Denoisers Cannot Copy Graphs: Align Your Graph Diffusion Modelscited by 7
  7. 2023Bridging the Gap between Chemical Reaction Pretraining and Conditional Molecule Generation with a Unified Modelcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.