Concomitant DAG Learning: On the Roles of Noise Adaptivity, Sparsity, and Non-negativity
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) constitute a central modeling tool to enable principled reasoning about cause-effect interactions in complex systems. However, since the causal structure underlying a group of variables is often unknown and interventions may be infeasible or ethically challenging to implement, there is a need to address the task of inferring DAGs from observational data. However, most classical structure identification approaches face two key obstacles: the combinatorial challenge of enforcing acyclicity, which severely limits scalability, and identifiability challenges arising from latent confounding or heterogeneous noise. This tutorial offers an overview of recent signal processing and optimization advances that address these issues by recasting DAG structure learning as a continuous, score-based estimation problem over adjacency matrices. We begin with a didactic introduction to structural equation models and the formulation of causal graph recovery, followed by a historical survey of score-based methods ranging from early combinatorial search schemes and greedy heuristics to modern continuous frameworks that leverage smooth characterizations of acyclicity. Building on this foundation, we describe concomitant DAG estimation methods that jointly infer sparse causal structure and exogenous noise levels, improving robustness under heteroscedasticity and distribution shifts by rendering the estimator noise adaptive. All in all, the tutorial introduces readers to challenges and opportunities for signal processing research at the crossroads of causal inference, high-dimensional statistics, and scalable graph learning, while outlining emerging directions including online, nonlinear, and neural causal discovery.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2026.
Builds on
22 of 44 references.
References · 22
- 2018DAGs with NO TEARS: Continuous Optimization for Structure Learningcited by 745
- 2019DAG-GNN: DAG Structure Learning with Graph Neural Networkscited by 329
- 2020Differentiable Causal Discovery from Interventional Datacited by 218
- 2021D'ya like DAGs? A Survey on Structure Learning and Causal Discoverycited by 209
- 2020On the Role of Sparsity and DAG Constraints for Learning Linear DAGscited by 186
- 2021Beware of the Simulated DAG! Causal Discovery Benchmarks May Be Easy To Gamecited by 159
- 2022DAGMA: Learning DAGs via M-matrices and a Log-Determinant Acyclicity Characterizationcited by 135
- 2018Connecting the Dots: Identifying Network Structure via Graph Signal Processingcited by 111
- 2013High-dimensional learning of linear causal networks via inverse covariance estimationcited by 86
- 2021BCD Nets: Scalable Variational Approaches for Bayesian Causal Discoverycited by 68
- 2020DAGs with No Fears: A Closer Look at Continuous Optimization for Learning Bayesian Networkscited by 66
- 2022Differentiable DAG Samplingcited by 46
10 more
- 2020Towards Scalable Bayesian Learning of Causal DAGscited by 33
- 2023Optimizing NOTEARS Objectives via Topological Swapscited by 17
- 2019Inexact Block Coordinate Descent Algorithms for Nonsmooth Nonconvex Optimizationcited by 12
- 2022Causal Fourier Analysis on Directed Acyclic Graphs and Posetscited by 12
- 2023CoLiDE: Concomitant Linear DAG Estimationcited by 12
- 2023Global Optimality in Bivariate Gradient-based DAG Learningcited by 10
- 2023DAG Learning on the Permutahedroncited by 9
- 2016Efficient Smoothed Concomitant Lasso Estimation for High Dimensional Regressioncited by 6
- 2017Generalized Concomitant Multi-Task Lasso for sparse multimodal regressioncited by 3
- 2026Exploiting Non-Negativity in DAG Structure Learningcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.