mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Exploiting Non-Negativity in DAG Structure Learning

arXiv 2605.19947 ↗First posted 19 May 2026cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This work addresses the problem of learning directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) from nodal observations generated by a linear structural equation model. DAG learning is a central task in signal processing, machine learning, and causal inference, but it remains challenging because acyclicity is a global combinatorial property. Continuous acyclicity constraints have led to important algorithmic advances by replacing the discrete DAG constraint with smooth equality constraints. However, existing formulations still involve difficult non-convex optimization landscapes and may suffer from degenerate first-order optimality conditions. Here, we restrict attention to DAGs with non-negative edge weights and exploit this additional structure to obtain a simpler characterization of acyclicity. Building on this characterization, we formulate a regularized non-negative DAG learning problem and develop an algorithm based on the method of multipliers. We further analyze the benign optimization landscape induced by non-negativity. In the population regime, we show that the true DAG is the unique global minimizer of the proposed augmented-Lagrangian formulation; moreover, the landscape contains no spurious interior stationary points, and the true DAG is the only acyclic KKT point. Numerical experiments on synthetic and real-world data show that the proposed method improves over state-of-the-art continuous DAG-learning alternatives.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2026.

Builds on

17 of 29 references.

References · 17

  1. 2018DAGs with NO TEARS: Continuous Optimization for Structure Learningcited by 745
  2. 2019DAG-GNN: DAG Structure Learning with Graph Neural Networkscited by 329
  3. 2020A Survey on Causal Inferencecited by 202
  4. 2020DYNOTEARS: Structure Learning from Time-Series Datacited by 198
  5. 2020On the Role of Sparsity and DAG Constraints for Learning Linear DAGscited by 186
  6. 2021Beware of the Simulated DAG! Causal Discovery Benchmarks May Be Easy To Gamecited by 159
  7. 2022DAGMA: Learning DAGs via M-matrices and a Log-Determinant Acyclicity Characterizationcited by 135
  8. 2018Connecting the Dots: Identifying Network Structure via Graph Signal Processingcited by 111
  9. 2013High-dimensional learning of linear causal networks via inverse covariance estimationcited by 86
  10. 2020DAGs with No Fears: A Closer Look at Continuous Optimization for Learning Bayesian Networkscited by 66
  11. 2020Signal Processing on Directed Graphscited by 28
  12. 2022Optimal estimation of Gaussian DAG modelscited by 14
5 more
  1. 2022Causal Fourier Analysis on Directed Acyclic Graphs and Posetscited by 12
  2. 2023CoLiDE: Concomitant Linear DAG Estimationcited by 12
  3. 2024Non-negative Weighted DAG Structure Learningcited by 7
  4. 2025BUILD with Precision: Bottom-Up Inference of Linear DAGscited by 4
  5. 2025Directed Acyclic Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.