Exploiting Non-Negativity in DAG Structure Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This work addresses the problem of learning directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) from nodal observations generated by a linear structural equation model. DAG learning is a central task in signal processing, machine learning, and causal inference, but it remains challenging because acyclicity is a global combinatorial property. Continuous acyclicity constraints have led to important algorithmic advances by replacing the discrete DAG constraint with smooth equality constraints. However, existing formulations still involve difficult non-convex optimization landscapes and may suffer from degenerate first-order optimality conditions. Here, we restrict attention to DAGs with non-negative edge weights and exploit this additional structure to obtain a simpler characterization of acyclicity. Building on this characterization, we formulate a regularized non-negative DAG learning problem and develop an algorithm based on the method of multipliers. We further analyze the benign optimization landscape induced by non-negativity. In the population regime, we show that the true DAG is the unique global minimizer of the proposed augmented-Lagrangian formulation; moreover, the landscape contains no spurious interior stationary points, and the true DAG is the only acyclic KKT point. Numerical experiments on synthetic and real-world data show that the proposed method improves over state-of-the-art continuous DAG-learning alternatives.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2026.
Builds on
17 of 29 references.
References · 17
- 2018DAGs with NO TEARS: Continuous Optimization for Structure Learningcited by 745
- 2019DAG-GNN: DAG Structure Learning with Graph Neural Networkscited by 329
- 2020A Survey on Causal Inferencecited by 202
- 2020DYNOTEARS: Structure Learning from Time-Series Datacited by 198
- 2020On the Role of Sparsity and DAG Constraints for Learning Linear DAGscited by 186
- 2021Beware of the Simulated DAG! Causal Discovery Benchmarks May Be Easy To Gamecited by 159
- 2022DAGMA: Learning DAGs via M-matrices and a Log-Determinant Acyclicity Characterizationcited by 135
- 2018Connecting the Dots: Identifying Network Structure via Graph Signal Processingcited by 111
- 2013High-dimensional learning of linear causal networks via inverse covariance estimationcited by 86
- 2020DAGs with No Fears: A Closer Look at Continuous Optimization for Learning Bayesian Networkscited by 66
- 2020Signal Processing on Directed Graphscited by 28
- 2022Optimal estimation of Gaussian DAG modelscited by 14
5 more
- 2022Causal Fourier Analysis on Directed Acyclic Graphs and Posetscited by 12
- 2023CoLiDE: Concomitant Linear DAG Estimationcited by 12
- 2024Non-negative Weighted DAG Structure Learningcited by 7
- 2025BUILD with Precision: Bottom-Up Inference of Linear DAGscited by 4
- 2025Directed Acyclic Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.