mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Lipschitz Optimization for Formal Verification of Homographies

arXiv 2605.23203 ↗First posted 22 May 2026cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The adoption of vision neural networks in regulated industries requires formal robustness guarantees, especially in safety-critical domains such as healthcare, autonomous vehicles, and aerospace. However, current approaches are confined to incomplete statistical verification or robustness to ℓp-norm and affine transforms, which cover only a narrow subset of perturbations to the image formation process. In particular, robustness to camera motion remains an open problem despite being key to deploy many vision applications. We present a formal verification approach that targets robustness against 3D motion perturbations of the capturing camera. We first establish a closed-form mapping from camera pose to pixel values. By analyzing the continuity properties of the resulting homographies, we show that recent work on Lipschitz optimization and piecewise continuity can be extended to derive tight linear bounds on perturbed pixel values. Our approach applies to scenes with predominantly planar structure, such as ground planes in augmented reality, road markings and traffic signs in autonomous driving, or planar workspaces in robotic manipulation. This enables the first formal verification of projective geometry transforms, without complex simulation, surrogate networks, or explicit image-formation models. We validate our implementation and show up to 89% speedup and 7% tighter bounds over prior work. We then evaluate our method on the VNN-COMP benchmark and reveal systematic weaknesses to projective perturbations. Finally, we demonstrate a real-world case study on a safety-critical runway classifier, highlighting practical vulnerabilities to camera motion, and addressing a key challenge in the certification of learned models. Data and code are publicly available at https://github.com/jeangud/homography-verification .

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2026.

Builds on

35 of 57 references.

References · 35

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  2. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  3. 2016Universal adversarial perturbationscited by 784
  4. 2017Reluplex: An Efficient SMT Solver for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 744
  5. 2018Efficient Neural Network Robustness Certification with General Activation Functionscited by 445
  6. 2017Certifying Some Distributional Robustness with Principled Adversarial Trainingcited by 337
  7. 2019Algorithms for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 221
  8. 2018Spatially Transformed Adversarial Examplescited by 195
  9. 2020Fast and Complete: Enabling Complete Neural Network Verification with Rapid and Massively Parallel Incomplete Verifierscited by 187
  10. 2022Vision-Centric BEV Perception: A Surveycited by 126
  11. 2020SoK: Certified Robustness for Deep Neural Networkscited by 105
  12. 2022General Cutting Planes for Bound-Propagation-Based Neural Network Verificationcited by 103
23 more
  1. 2018Reachability Analysis of Deep Neural Networks with Provable Guaranteescited by 93
  2. 2024Marabou 2.0: A Versatile Formal Analyzer of Neural Networkscited by 81
  3. 2021The Second International Verification of Neural Networks Competition (VNN-COMP 2021): Summary and Resultscited by 71
  4. 2024Neural Network Verification with Branch-and-Bound for General Nonlinearitiescited by 47
  5. 2017Geometric robustness of deep networks: analysis and improvementcited by 45
  6. 2017Global optimization of Lipschitz functionscited by 39
  7. 2023When Deep Learning Meets Polyhedral Theory: A Surveycited by 39
  8. 2023The Fourth International Verification of Neural Networks Competition (VNN-COMP 2023): Summary and Resultscited by 38
  9. 2025The 6th International Verification of Neural Networks Competition (VNN-COMP 2025): Summary and Resultscited by 27
  10. 2022Towards Compositional Adversarial Robustness: Generalizing Adversarial Training to Composite Semantic Perturbationscited by 26
  11. 2022Toward Certified Robustness Against Real-World Distribution Shiftscited by 16
  12. 2022Provable Defense Against Geometric Transformationscited by 14
  13. 2023LARD -- Landing Approach Runway Detection -- Dataset for Vision Based Landingcited by 14
  14. 2018Formal Verification of CNN-based Perception Systemscited by 13
  15. 2022ART-Point: Improving Rotation Robustness of Point Cloud Classifiers via Adversarial Rotationcited by 12
  16. 2018The Right (Angled) Perspective: Improving the Understanding of Road Scenes Using Boosted Inverse Perspective Mappingcited by 11
  17. 2023Towards Verifying the Geometric Robustness of Large-scale Neural Networkscited by 11
  18. 2024Verification of Geometric Robustness of Neural Networks via Piecewise Linear Approximation and Lipschitz Optimisationcited by 7
  19. 2018Robustness of Rotation-Equivariant Networks to Adversarial Perturbationscited by 6
  20. 2023Bayesian Safety Validation for Failure Probability Estimation of Black-Box Systemscited by 5
  21. 2017Real-time Geometry-Aware Augmented Reality in Minimally Invasive Surgerycited by 3
  22. 2022Robustness Certification of Visual Perception Models via Camera Motion Smoothingcited by 3
  23. 2023Pixel-wise Smoothing for Certified Robustness against Camera Motion Perturbationscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.