Scalable Heterogeneous Graph Foundation Models for Data-Driven Optimal Power Flow in Smart Grids
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Fast and reliable optimal power flow (OPF) approximation is important for power system operation, yet heterogeneous OPF graph models are often evaluated either with architecture-specific implementations or on limited training corpora. This paper presents a large-scale heterogeneous graph-learning workflow, built on HydraGNN, for data-driven OPF surrogate modeling and graph foundation-model (GFM) development. The workflow preserves buses, generators, loads, shunts, alternating-current (AC) lines, transformers, and device-to-bus relations and provides a common implementation for distributed preprocessing, multi-graphics-processing-unit (GPU) training, hyperparameter optimization (HPO), and downstream adaptation. Using approximately three million heterogeneous graphs from ten Power Grid Library for Benchmarking AC Optimal Power Flow Algorithms (PGLib-OPF) cases spanning 14 to 13,659 buses, we compare six heterogeneous graph neural network (GNN) families under a common HPO campaign on Frontier, resulting in two compact HeteroSAGE and HeteroHEAT models (~1.6-1.7 million parameters) that achieve the lowest observed validation MSE. Strong and weak scaling using up to 1,024 Frontier nodes show that 256 nodes (corresponding to 1,024 AMD MI250X GPUs) provides the best time-to-solution balance for the measured workload. Two downstream tasks evaluate task adaptation on the IEEE 118-bus case: a classification task to distinguish nominal operating conditions from artificially generated extreme-overload conditions and N-1 single-component-outage regression to predict bus voltage magnitude and phase angle. Partial fine-tuning provides the strongest balance between predictive performance and computational requirements.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2026.
Builds on
18 of 44 references.
References · 18
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
- 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,787
- 2021How Attentive are Graph Attention Networks?cited by 835
- 2021Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networkscited by 643
- 2020Principal Neighbourhood Aggregation for Graph Netscited by 478
- 2019Predicting AC Optimal Power Flows: Combining Deep Learning and Lagrangian Dual Methodscited by 94
- 2019The Power Grid Library for Benchmarking AC Optimal Power Flow Algorithmscited by 65
- 2019Optimal Power Flow Using Graph Neural Networkscited by 63
- 2021Physics-Informed Neural Networks for AC Optimal Power Flowcited by 54
- 2020Learning Optimal Power Flow: Worst-Case Guarantees for Neural Networkscited by 28
- 2022Topology-aware Graph Neural Networks for Learning Feasible and Adaptive ac-OPF Solutionscited by 28
6 more
- 2024Foundation Models for the Electric Power Gridcited by 28
- 2023PowerFlowNet: Power Flow Approximation Using Message Passing Graph Neural Networkscited by 21
- 2021Heterogeneous Edge-Enhanced Graph Attention Network For Multi-Agent Trajectory Predictioncited by 17
- 2026LUMINA: Foundation Models for Topology Transferable ACOPFcited by 8
- 2026LUMINA: A Grid Foundation Model for Benchmarking AC Optimal Power Flow Surrogate Learningcited by 2
- 2026Towards Systematic Generalization for Power Grid Optimization Problemscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.