mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

CLORE: Content-Level Optimization for Reasoning Efficiency

arXiv 2605.22211 ↗First posted 21 May 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning post-training has improved the reasoning ability of large language models, but often produces unnecessarily long, repetitive, or semantically opaque reasoning traces. Existing efficient reasoning methods mainly regulate response length through explicit budgets or length-aware rewards, leaving intermediate reasoning content weakly supervised. We propose CLORE, a content-level optimization framework that improves reasoning efficiency by editing correct on-policy rollouts. CLORE uses an external augmentation model to delete repetitive segments, illegible or task-irrelevant content, and superfluous reasoning after the solution is established, while preserving the final answer. The resulting augmented--original pairs are optimized with an auxiliary reference-free DPO objective alongside standard policy-gradient training. By restricting augmentation to correct trajectories and performing local deletion, CLORE keeps edited rollouts close to the policy distribution and mitigates off-policy mismatch. Experiments on DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B and Qwen2.5-Math-7B across five mathematical reasoning benchmarks show that CLORE improves the accuracy--efficiency trade-off and remains compatible with GRPO, DAPO, Training Efficient, and ThinkPrune. Content-level analyses further show that CLORE reduces repetitive reasoning, illegible content, and post-answer exploration, supporting content-level supervision as a complementary direction to length-level control.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 47 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 May 2026.

Builds on

47 of 61 references.

Closest ancestors · 23

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026TRiMS: Real-Time Tracking of Minimal Sufficient Length for Efficient Reasoning via RL18 Mar
  2. 2026The Art of Efficient Reasoning: Data, Reward, and Optimization24 Feb
  3. 2025Do LLMs Really Need 10+ Thoughts for "Find the Time 1000 Days Later"? Towards Structural Understanding of LLM Overthinking9 Oct
  4. 2025ThinkDial: An Open Recipe for Controlling Reasoning Effort in Large Language Models26 Aug
  5. 2025Large Reasoning Models are not thinking straight: on the unreliability of thinking trajectories1 Jul
  6. 2025AALC: Large Language Model Efficient Reasoning via Adaptive Accuracy-Length Control25 Jun
  7. 2025Just Enough Thinking: Efficient Reasoning with Adaptive Length Penalties Reinforcement Learning5 Jun
  8. 2025Revisiting Overthinking in Long Chain-of-Thought from the Perspective of Self-Doubt29 May
  9. 2025AdaCtrl: Towards Adaptive and Controllable Reasoning via Difficulty-Aware Budgeting24 May
  10. 2025Thinking Fast and Right: Balancing Accuracy and Reasoning Length with Adaptive Rewards23 May
  11. 2025Don't Overthink it. Preferring Shorter Thinking Chains for Improved LLM Reasoning23 May
  12. 2025Learn to Reason Efficiently with Adaptive Length-based Reward Shaping21 May
11 more
  1. 2025Shorten After You're Right: Lazy Length Penalties for Reasoning RL18 May
  2. 2025SelfBudgeter: Adaptive Token Allocation for Efficient LLM Reasoning16 May
  3. 2025Between Underthinking and Overthinking: An Empirical Study of Reasoning Length and correctness in LLMs30 Apr
  4. 2025ShorterBetter: Guiding Reasoning Models to Find Optimal Inference Length for Efficient Reasoning30 Apr
  5. 2025ThinkPrune: Pruning Long Chain-of-Thought of LLMs via Reinforcement Learning2 Apr
  6. 2025Stop Overthinking: A Survey on Efficient Reasoning for Large Language Models20 Mar
  7. 2025L1: Controlling How Long A Reasoning Model Thinks With Reinforcement Learning6 Mar
  8. 2025Demystifying Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in LLMs5 Feb
  9. 2025Competitive Programming with Large Reasoning Models3 Feb
  10. 2025O1-Pruner: Length-Harmonizing Fine-Tuning for O1-Like Reasoning Pruning22 Jan
  11. 2024Concise Thoughts: Impact of Output Length on LLM Reasoning and Cost29 Jul

Other references · 24

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  3. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  4. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
  5. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  6. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  7. 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scalecited by 2,678
  8. 2024OpenAI o1 System Cardcited by 1,220
  9. 2024Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvementcited by 1,057
  10. 2019Neural Text Generation with Unlikelihood Trainingcited by 489
  11. 2024Large Language Models for Mathematical Reasoning: Progresses and Challengescited by 283
  12. 2025Training Language Models to Reason Efficientlycited by 242
12 more
  1. 2025REINFORCE++: Stabilizing Critic-Free Policy Optimization with Global Advantage Normalizationcited by 233
  2. 2025When More is Less: Understanding Chain-of-Thought Length in LLMscited by 182
  3. 2025OverThink: Slowdown Attacks on Reasoning LLMscited by 94
  4. 2024Prover-Verifier Games improve legibility of LLM outputscited by 79
  5. 2025When Thinking Fails: The Pitfalls of Reasoning for Instruction-Following in LLMscited by 51
  6. 2025SeRL: Self-Play Reinforcement Learning for Large Language Models with Limited Datacited by 50
  7. 2024How Easily do Irrelevant Inputs Skew the Responses of Large Language Models?cited by 44
  8. 2025Stable Reinforcement Learning for Efficient Reasoningcited by 27
  9. 2025A Pragmatic Way to Measure Chain-of-Thought Monitorabilitycited by 13
  10. 2025Reasoning Models Sometimes Output Illegible Chains of Thoughtcited by 9
  11. 2026Measuring Weak-to-Strong Legibility of Reasoning Modelscited by 5
  12. 2026Does Faithfulness-Guided Alignment Hurt Accuracy? Unlocking Accurate and Faithful Post-Retrieval Reasoningcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025CLPO: Curriculum Learning meets Policy Optimization for LLM Reasoning
  2. 2025How Far Are We from Optimal Reasoning Efficiency?
  3. 2025Reasoning Vectors: Transferring Chain-of-Thought Capabilities via Task Arithmetic
  4. 2026IAPO: Information-Aware Policy Optimization for Token-Efficient Reasoning
  5. 2025ConciseRL: Conciseness-Guided Reinforcement Learning for Efficient Reasoning Models
  6. 2026ThinkTwice: Jointly Optimizing Large Language Models for Reasoning and Self-Refinement
  7. 2026Rollout Efficiency in Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning Large Language Models: A Taxonomy and Future Directions
  8. 2025Optimizing Length Compression in Large Reasoning Models