mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PEARL: Unbiased Percentile Estimation via Contrastive Learning for Industrial-Scale Livestream Recommendation

arXiv 2605.21752 ↗First posted 20 May 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recommender systems trained on user interaction data are susceptible to behavioral intensity imbalance--a systematic distortion arising from heterogeneous engagement patterns across users. This imbalance skews feedback signals such that observed interactions no longer faithfully reflect true preferences, causing models to disproportionately amplify signals from highly active users while underrepresenting others, which ultimately degrades recommendation quality and robustness at scale. To address this issue, we propose a nonparametric contrastive percentile approximation framework, PEARL, that models relative preference signals instead of absolute engagement magnitudes. Building upon relative advantage debiasing, PEARL leverages real contrastive interaction samples to approximate percentile relationships directly, without relying on auxiliary distribution estimation models. We provide theoretical justification demonstrating that such pairwise comparisons yield unbiased estimates of percentile-based preference signals. For broader applicability, we introduce a prediction-based bootstrapping mechanism for percentile smoothing to handle sparse and discrete feedback, alongside a generalized value-weighted formulation and a co-training strategy to enhance both modeling flexibility and representation learning. Extensive offline experiments demonstrate that PEARL effectively mitigates behavioral bias and consistently improves recommendation performance across multiple ranking targets. Deployed in a production livestream platform with a combined user base of billions, online A/B testing confirms substantial real-world gains: +2.10% Watch Duration, +0.80% Consumption Amount, +1.49% Interaction Rate, and -6.91% Report Rate.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2026.

Builds on

15 of 23 references.

References · 15

  1. 2018Variational Autoencoders for Collaborative Filteringcited by 308
  2. 2016Recommendations as Treatments: Debiasing Learning and Evaluationcited by 246
  3. 2017Neural Attentive Session-based Recommendationcited by 237
  4. 2016Unbiased Learning-to-Rank with Biased Feedbackcited by 155
  5. 2019Learning Disentangled Representations for Recommendationcited by 110
  6. 2024Wukong: Towards a Scaling Law for Large-Scale Recommendationcited by 72
  7. 2019The Unfairness of Popularity Bias in Recommendationcited by 68
  8. 2021AutoDebias: Learning to Debias for Recommendationcited by 68
  9. 2022Deconfounding Duration Bias in Watch-time Prediction for Video Recommendationcited by 37
  10. 2018The Deconfounded Recommender: A Causal Inference Approach to Recommendationcited by 19
  11. 2022DVR: Micro-Video Recommendation Optimizing Watch-Time-Gain under Duration Biascited by 13
  12. 2024Conditional Quantile Estimation for Uncertain Watch Time in Short-Video Recommendationcited by 6
3 more
  1. 2025Relative Advantage Debiasing for Watch-Time Prediction in Short-Video Recommendationcited by 4
  2. 2026Zenith: Scaling up Ranking Models for Billion-scale Livestreaming Recommendationcited by 3
  3. 2023ContentCTR: Frame-level Live Streaming Click-Through Rate Prediction with Multimodal Transformercited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.