Everywhere Valid Bounds on False Discovery Proportions in Conformal Inference
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Modern applications of conformal inference to multiple testing problems, such as outlier detection and candidate selection, often involve selecting test samples whose conformal p-values fall below a threshold. The quality of such methods is often measured by the false discovery proportion (FDP), defined as the fraction of incorrect selections. Existing approaches typically control the expected value of the FDP, using methods such as the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure. This approach fails to provide high-probability bounds on the realized false discovery proportion and invalidates statistical guarantees if the rejection threshold is selected after inspecting the data. This paper establishes finite-sample, distribution-free upper bounds on the FDP that hold simultaneously over all possible rejection thresholds, enabling arbitrary post hoc selection of the threshold. Simultaneous validity is achieved by constructing a high-probability envelope for the empirical distribution function of null conformal p-values by sampling from their joint distribution. Furthermore, our framework allows practitioners to modulate the envelope's shape, thereby producing tight bounds in rejection regions of primary interest. We use this flexible approach to derive simultaneous FDP upper bounds for both outlier detection and conformal selection. We demonstrate through synthetic and real-data experiments that the resulting bounds are both valid and substantially less conservative than those derived from existing approaches.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2026.
Builds on
20 of 48 references.
References · 20
- 2020Evaluation: from precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlationcited by 425
- 2021Testing for Outliers with Conformal p-valuescited by 134
- 2022Selection by Prediction with Conformal p-valuescited by 69
- 2023Model-free selective inference under covariate shift via weighted conformal p-valuescited by 29
- 2023Transductive conformal inference with adaptive scorescited by 21
- 2022Integrative conformal p-values for powerful out-of-distribution testing with labeled outlierscited by 19
- 2022Adaptive novelty detection with false discovery rate guaranteecited by 15
- 2023Universal distribution of the empirical coverage in split conformal predictioncited by 15
- 2024Optimized Conformal Selection: Powerful Selective Inference After Conformity Score Optimizationcited by 14
- 2025Multivariate Conformal Selectioncited by 8
- 2025Diversifying Conformal Selectionscited by 6
- 2018Permutation-based simultaneous confidence bounds for the false discovery proportioncited by 3
8 more
- 2022Simultaneous false discovery proportion bounds via knockoffs and closed testingcited by 3
- 2013Global envelope tests for spatial processescited by 2
- 2014Higher criticism: p-values and criticismcited by 2
- 2016Simultaneous Control of All False Discovery Proportions in Large-Scale Multiple Hypothesis Testingcited by 2
- 2021Permutation-Based True Discovery Guarantee by Sum Testscited by 2
- 2019Only Closed Testing Procedures are Admissible for Controlling False Discovery Proportionscited by 1
- 2021A central limit theorem for the Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery proportion under a factor modelcited by 1
- 2026Beyond Fixed False Discovery Rates: Post-Hoc Conformal Selection with E-Variablescited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.