SMA-DP: Spectral Memory-Aware Differential Privacy for Deep Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Differentially private stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD) enables private deep learning through per-example clipping and calibrated Gaussian noise, but its high-variance updates can reduce utility on challenging datasets. We propose SMA-DP-SGD, a Spectral Memory-Aware Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent method that augments DP-SGD with a fractional memory branch built only from previously privatized noisy releases. WeightWatcher-inspired power-law spectral exponents provide group-wise reliability signals, instantiated layer-wise in our experiments, to adapt the decay and effective memory depth. Private-history alignment, norm matching, and warm-up activation stabilize the memory contribution. Privacy remains transparent: conditioned on the private release history, the memory branch is fixed, and the only newly data-dependent term is the current clipped sum scaled by a fixed coefficient (β). Hence, SMA-DP-SGD preserves a clean conditional sensitivity structure and exactly recovers group-wise DP-SGD when (β=1). Experiments on CIFAR-100, CIFAR-10, and MNIST show competitive or superior accuracy over several DP optimization baselines, with the largest gains on CIFAR-100 and CIFAR-10. CIFAR-10 ablations show that (β) controls the privacy--utility trajectory, while spectral and memory diagnostics confirm a controlled short-to-moderate effective memory depth and a small memory-branch ratio. Runtime analysis shows that the mechanism incurs additional overhead, about (2.94×) DP-SGD in our CIFAR-10 implementation, revealing a practical trade-off between adaptive private memory and computational cost.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2026.
Builds on
17 of 35 references.
References · 17
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
- 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,417
- 2016On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minimacited by 1,352
- 2017Spectrally-normalized margin bounds for neural networkscited by 686
- 2017Exploring Generalization in Deep Learningcited by 600
- 2019An Investigation into Neural Net Optimization via Hessian Eigenvalue Densitycited by 292
- 2018Scalable Private Learning with PATEcited by 269
- 2018Subsampled R'enyi Differential Privacy and Analytical Moments Accountantcited by 236
- 2020Differentially Private Learning Needs Better Features (or Much More Data)cited by 235
- 2022Unlocking High-Accuracy Differentially Private Image Classification through Scalecited by 224
- 2019Differentially Private Learning with Adaptive Clippingcited by 220
- 2018Implicit Self-Regularization in Deep Neural Networks: Evidence from Random Matrix Theory and Implications for Learningcited by 215
5 more
- 2020Predicting trends in the quality of state-of-the-art neural networks without access to training or testing datacited by 115
- 2019Deep Learning with Gaussian Differential Privacycited by 114
- 2019Traditional and Heavy-Tailed Self Regularization in Neural Network Modelscited by 105
- 2026Statistical Roughness-Informed Machine Unlearningcited by 1
- 2026When Gradient Clipping Becomes a Control Mechanism for Differential Privacy in Deep Learningcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.