mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Statistical Roughness-Informed Machine Unlearning

arXiv 2602.09304 ↗First posted 10 Feb 2026cs.LGcited by 1

On the map: LLM safety and security → Machine unlearning

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine unlearning aims to remove the influence of a designated forget set from a trained model while preserving utility on the retained data. In modern deep networks, approximate unlearning frequently fails under large or adversarial deletions due to pronounced layer-wise heterogeneity: some layers exhibit stable, well-regularized representations while others are brittle, undertrained, or overfit, so naive update allocation can trigger catastrophic forgetting or unstable dynamics. We propose Statistical-Roughness Adaptive Gradient Unlearning (SRAGU), a mechanism-first unlearning algorithm that reallocates unlearning updates using layer-wise statistical roughness operationalized via heavy-tailed spectral diagnostics of layer weight matrices. Starting from an Adaptive Gradient Unlearning (AGU) sensitivity signal computed on the forget set, SRAGU estimates a WeightWatcher-style heavy-tailed exponent for each layer, maps it to a bounded spectral stability weight, and uses this stability signal to spectrally reweight the AGU sensitivities before applying the same minibatch update form. This concentrates unlearning motion in spectrally stable layers while damping updates in unstable or overfit layers, improving stability under hard deletions. We evaluate unlearning via behavioral alignment to a gold retrained reference model trained from scratch on the retained data, using empirical prediction-divergence and KL-to-gold proxies on a forget-focused query set; we additionally report membership inference auditing as a complementary leakage signal, treating forget-set points as should-be-forgotten members during evaluation.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 21 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2026.

Builds on

21 of 30 references.

Closest ancestors · 9

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024What makes unlearning hard and what to do about it3 Jun
  2. 2024Machine Unlearning: A Comprehensive Survey13 May
  3. 2024Unlearning Traces the Influential Training Data of Language Models26 Jan
  4. 2023SalUn: Empowering Machine Unlearning via Gradient-based Weight Saliency in Both Image Classification and Generation19 Oct
  5. 2023Model Sparsity Can Simplify Machine Unlearning11 Apr
  6. 2023Boundary Unlearning21 Mar
  7. 2023Towards Unbounded Machine Unlearning20 Feb
  8. 2022A Survey of Machine Unlearning6 Sep
  9. 2021Remember What You Want to Forget: Algorithms for Machine Unlearning4 Mar

Other references · 12

  1. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
  2. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
  3. 2016On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minimacited by 1,337
  4. 2017Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Netscited by 1,126
  5. 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,020
  6. 2019Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Net: Selective Forgetting in Deep Networkscited by 599
  7. 2023Erasing Concepts from Diffusion Modelscited by 530
  8. 2019Certified Data Removal from Machine Learning Modelscited by 512
  9. 2019Making AI Forget You: Data Deletion in Machine Learningcited by 447
  10. 2018Implicit Self-Regularization in Deep Neural Networks: Evidence from Random Matrix Theory and Implications for Learningcited by 211
  11. 2020Forgetting Outside the Box: Scrubbing Deep Networks of Information Accessible from Input-Output Observationscited by 171
  12. 2019Traditional and Heavy-Tailed Self Regularization in Neural Network Modelscited by 104

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.