Disentangling Sampling from Training Budget in Class-Imbalanced CT Body Composition Segmentation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Class imbalance is a fundamental challenge in medical image segmentation, where frequent classes typically dominate training at the expense of rare classes. Loss-based approaches mitigate imbalance by reweighting the per-pixel loss within the batch, while sampling strategies control which images enter the batch. Yet neither explicitly controls which classes appear within the batch, leaving rare-class exposure only partially rebalanced. In this work, we adopt episodic sampling from few-shot learning to promote class-balanced batch construction in a fully supervised setting. We decouple episodic sampling from its conventional metric-learning context and evaluate it in body composition segmentation in CT. We compare episodic sampling against random and weighted sampling on nine muscle and adipose tissues, derived from 210 scans of the public SAROS dataset. Training is performed under full- and low-data regimes, with additional comparisons under matched training iteration budgets. Under full-data training, all three strategies performed comparably (mean Dice 0.882 for episodic, 0.878 for random and weighted). Under low-data training, episodic sampling outperformed random and weighted (0.787 vs. 0.758 and 0.762), driven by a 12-fold difference in training iterations. Under matched training budgets, random and weighted overfit earlier, while episodic improved for approximately three times more iterations before plateauing. Our findings identify the training iteration budget as under-recognized confound in sampling strategies, motivating iteration-aware evaluation protocols for small datasets. Furthermore, the residual advantage of episodic sampling is consistent with an implicit regularization effect of class-balanced batches, offering a low-cost, model-agnostic strategy for class-imbalanced medical image segmentation. Code is available at https://github.com/iasonsky/episodic-sampling.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2026.
Builds on
18 of 31 references.
References · 18
- 2017Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learningcited by 3,015
- 2019LVIS: A Dataset for Large Vocabulary Instance Segmentationcited by 1,217
- 2019Decoupling Representation and Classifier for Long-Tailed Recognitioncited by 809
- 2017Generalised Dice overlap as a deep learning loss function for highly unbalanced segmentationscited by 620
- 2019BBN: Bilateral-Branch Network with Cumulative Learning for Long-Tailed Visual Recognitioncited by 403
- 2018Not All Samples Are Created Equal: Deep Learning with Importance Samplingcited by 328
- 2016Efficient Multi-Scale 3D CNN with Fully Connected CRF for Accurate Brain Lesion Segmentationcited by 263
- 2018What is the Effect of Importance Weighting in Deep Learning?cited by 251
- 2021Accounting for Variance in Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 201
- 2020Self-Supervision with Superpixels: Training Few-shot Medical Image Segmentation without Annotationcited by 128
- 2023Rethinking Semi-Supervised Medical Image Segmentation: A Variance-Reduction Perspectivecited by 43
- 2019Budgeted Training: Rethinking Deep Neural Network Training Under Resource Constraintscited by 37
6 more
- 2014Accelerating Minibatch Stochastic Gradient Descent using Stratified Samplingcited by 21
- 2023Simplifying Neural Network Training Under Class Imbalancecited by 18
- 2023Instance-Aware Repeat Factor Sampling for Long-Tailed Object Detectioncited by 7
- 2021How Important is Importance Sampling for Deep Budgeted Training?cited by 5
- 2025Imbalanced Medical Image Segmentation with Pixel-dependent Noisy Labelscited by 5
- 2023Comp2Comp: Open-Source Body Composition Assessment on Computed Tomographycited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.