mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Interpretable Computer Vision for Defect Detection in X-ray Tomography of Aerospace SiC/SiC Composites

arXiv 2605.20159 ↗First posted 19 May 2026cs.CV cond-mat.mtrl-sci cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Non-destructive testing of aerospace SiC/SiC composites via X-ray computed tomography (XCT) relies on expert visual assessment, with current workflows offering limited traceability for accept/reject decisions. Deep convolutional networks can automate defect detection, yet their black-box nature conflicts with the transparency that industrial inspection practice demands. To close this gap, we introduce p-ResNet-50, a convolutional framework extended with a prototype layer that couples high detection accuracy with case-based explanations. Six learned prototypes are explicitly aligned with expert-defined semantic categories-healthy matrix, matrix--air interfaces, pores, line-like defects, and mixed morphologies-so that every classification is traceable to a physically meaningful reference. Two novel regularisation terms, anchor-based and medoid-based, tether prototypes to expert-selected patches and prevent prototype collapse, addressing a known limitation of prototype networks. Latent-space analysis via UMAP delineates semantically coherent sub-domains and maps zones of uncertainty where misclassifications concentrate, giving inspectors an explicit picture of where the model is-and is not-reliable. The framework is validated on an XCT patch dataset of approximately 12,000 patches extracted from four defect-rich SiC/SiC laboratory specimens. Taking a black-box ResNet-50 as a baseline (ROC-AUC = 0.991), the prototype extension achieves comparable performance (accuracy 0.957 vs. 0.959; ROC-AUC 0.994 vs. 0.993) while trading a slight reduction in sensitivity for higher precision and specificity. Each decision is backed by representative evidence patches, and the model explicitly flags its uncertainty regions. Beyond defect mapping, the framework establishes a reusable methodology for embedding domain-expert knowledge into prototype networks, applicable to other XCT inspection scenarios requiring traceable, auditable decisions.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2026.

Builds on

13 of 27 references.

References · 13

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  3. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  4. 2017Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learningcited by 3,001
  5. 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,841
  6. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  7. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
  8. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
  9. 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 970
  10. 2018This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 731
  11. 2019Interpretable machine learning: definitions, methods, and applicationscited by 303
  12. 2020Neural Prototype Trees for Interpretable Fine-grained Image Recognitioncited by 213
1 more
  1. 2021Interpretable Image Classification with Differentiable Prototypes Assignmentcited by 97

Built on by

Not cited yet.