StruMPL: Multi-task Dense Regression under Disjoint Partial Supervision and MNAR Labels
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Estimating forest aboveground biomass (AGB) from Earth observation combines two structurally incompatible label sources: spaceborne lidar provides canopy structure at millions of locations but no biomass estimate, and ground-based plots provide biomass at thousands of biased locations but no metrics of structure. No single training sample carries labels for all target variables, plot labels are missing not at random (MNAR), and biomass is linked to the structural variables by known but biome-specific allometric laws. We formalise this as multi-task dense regression under heterogeneous disjoint partial supervision with MNAR labels and inter-task physical constraints, and propose StruMPL to address it jointly. A shared encoder feeds per-variable regression, imputation, and propensity heads for spatial MNAR correction, and a learnable physics module that evaluates the inter-task constraint on the model's own predictions at every pixel. The supervised loss uses an Augmented IPW (AIPW) pseudo-outcome with stop-gradients on the propensity and on the imputation baseline; we show analytically and empirically that both are necessary for joint optimisation to recover IPW-weighted stationary points while keeping the loss bounded. On two ecologically distinct biomes, StruMPL outperforms ablation variants and the closest published method on AGB RMSE and bias, with a stratified analysis showing AIPW reduces high-AGB bias by ~54%.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2026.
Builds on
20 of 43 references.
References · 20
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,789
- 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,085
- 2018Attention U-Net: Learning Where to Look for the Pancreascited by 1,435
- 2020Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task Learningcited by 1,256
- 2021Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for fluid mechanics: A reviewcited by 473
- 2020Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation with Cross-Consistency Trainingcited by 376
- 2019Which Tasks Should Be Learned Together in Multi-task Learning?cited by 375
- 2016Recommendations as Treatments: Debiasing Learning and Evaluationcited by 248
- 2021Efficiently Identifying Task Groupings for Multi-Task Learningcited by 222
- 2022A high-resolution canopy height model of the Earthcited by 91
8 more
- 2019Unbiased Recommender Learning from Missing-Not-At-Random Implicit Feedbackcited by 79
- 2022GenHPF: General Healthcare Predictive Framework with Multi-task Multi-source Learningcited by 36
- 2019Semi-Supervised Adversarial Monocular Depth Estimationcited by 11
- 2024Joint-Task Regularization for Partially Labeled Multi-Task Learningcited by 6
- 2024Unified Deep Learning Model for Global Prediction of Aboveground Biomass, Canopy Height and Cover from High-Resolution, Multi-Sensor Satellite Imagerycited by 6
- 2024Adapting Physics-Informed Neural Networks to Improve ODE Optimization in Mosquito Population Dynamicscited by 4
- 2024Exploring Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Crop Yield Loss Forecastingcited by 3
- 2026Process-Guided Concept Bottleneck Modelcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.