mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Explainable Wastewater Digital Twins: Adaptive Context-Conditioned Structured Simulators with Self-Falsifying Decision Support

arXiv 2605.19826 ↗First posted 19 May 2026cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Operators of safety-critical industrial processes increasingly rely on digital twins to screen control interventions, but such simulators rarely carry certified safety guarantees. Wastewater treatment plants exemplify the gap: operators face a daily safety-efficiency trade-off where aerating too little risks effluent violations and nitrous-oxide (N2O) spikes, and aerating too much wastes energy. We develop an explainable digital twin for aeration and dosing setpoints. CCSS-IX, the simulator, is a bank of interpretable locally linear state-space "experts" adaptively mixed by a context-aware gating network, building on a continuous-time regime-switching scaffold. A runtime decision layer applies conformal risk control to abstain, reopen, or return a falsifying temporal witness for any operator-proposed action that cannot be statistically certified. The artificial-intelligence contribution is twofold: an identifiable, context-conditioned structured surrogate that retains operator-readable dynamics, and a self-falsifying decision rule with finite-sample coverage guarantees. The engineering contribution is a validated, end-to-end decision-support pipeline, tested on a 1000-step slice of the Avedore full-scale plant (42.6% sensor missingness, 2-minute sampling), the Agtrup/BlueKolding full-scale plant in Denmark, and the Benchmark Simulation Model No. 2 (BSM2) international benchmark, under a matched ten-seed protocol. The static structured ensemble lies within 0.78% root-mean-square error of an unconstrained black-box reference, and the adaptive variant within 1.08%. The calibrated reopen rule cuts aggregate two-plant regret by 43.6% at an unsafe-action cost weight of 4 and eliminates unsafe chosen actions on the BSM2 main slice. Event-aligned temporal witnesses prevent 93 of 187 false-safe N2O approvals, about 4.65x the dyadic baseline (paired McNemar p < 1e-21).

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2026.

Builds on

28 of 56 references.

References · 28

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2023Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spacescited by 4,718
  3. 2021Efficiently Modeling Long Sequences with Structured State Spacescited by 2,465
  4. 2017FiLM: Visual Reasoning with a General Conditioning Layercited by 2,333
  5. 2016HyperNetworkscited by 1,027
  6. 2017Selective Classification for Deep Neural Networkscited by 852
  7. 2022Simplified State Space Layers for Sequence Modelingcited by 788
  8. 2019Temporal Fusion Transformers for Interpretable Multi-horizon Time Series Forecastingcited by 761
  9. 2020Neural Controlled Differential Equations for Irregular Time Seriescited by 506
  10. 2017Deep learning for universal linear embeddings of nonlinear dynamicscited by 494
  11. 2020Neural Additive Models: Interpretable Machine Learning with Neural Netscited by 319
  12. 2022Conformal Risk Controlcited by 299
16 more
  1. 2021Modern Koopman Theory for Dynamical Systemscited by 276
  2. 2016Linear predictors for nonlinear dynamical systems: Koopman operator meets model predictive controlcited by 140
  3. 2022Safe Planning in Dynamic Environments using Conformal Predictioncited by 119
  4. 2019Digital Twin: Values, Challenges and Enablerscited by 81
  5. 2025Selective Conformal Risk Controlcited by 11
  6. 2024Time Series Dataset for Modeling and Forecasting of N2O in Wastewater Treatmentcited by 3
  7. 2025Safety Monitoring for Learning-Enabled Cyber-Physical Systems in Out-of-Distribution Scenarioscited by 3
  8. 2025Stable-by-Design Neural Network-Based LPV State-Space Models for System Identificationcited by 2
  9. 2026When Environments Shift: Safe Planning with Generative Priors and Robust Conformal Predictioncited by 2
  10. 2026Staggered Integral Online Conformal Prediction for Safe Dynamics Adaptation with Multi-Step Coverage Guaranteescited by 2
  11. 2026SOLIS: Physics-Informed Learning of Interpretable Neural Surrogates for Nonlinear Systemscited by 2
  12. 2026Data-Driven Open-Loop Simulation for Digital-Twin Operator Decision Support in Wastewater Treatmentcited by 2
  13. 2024Identifiable Representation and Model Learning for Latent Dynamic Systemscited by 1
  14. 2024Machine learning in wastewater treatment: insights from modelling a pilot denitrification reactorcited by 1
  15. 2026Optimal Control-Based Falsification of Learnt Dynamics via Neural ODEs and Symbolic Regressioncited by 1
  16. 2026End-to-End Identifiable and Consistent Recurrent Switching Dynamical Systemscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.