PMF-CL: Pareto-Minimal-Forgetting Continual Learner for Conflicting Tasks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In the literature, many continual learning (CL) algorithms have been proposed to address the issue of catastrophic forgetting in ML models (i.e., learning new tasks leads to the loss of performance on previously learned tasks). Although all CL approaches use some form of memory to retain information about past tasks, a grounded understanding of what information needs to be stored to minimize catastrophic forgetting remains elusive. Recently, it has been recognized that under the strong assumption of the existence of a common global minimizer over all tasks, catastrophic forgetting can be completely avoided. However, in practice, tasks rarely have a common global minimizer, and a certain amount of forgetting is inevitable. In this paper, we propose a foundational reframing of CL as balancing conflicting tasks in hindsight from a multi-task learning (MTL) perspective. The approach is based on finding Pareto-optimal solutions, i.e., the solutions which, by definition, minimally forget the previous tasks in the Pareto sense. We derive a Pareto-minimal-forgetting CL (PMF-CL) algorithm for linear and basis-function regression. Our algorithm naturally extends to loss functions with quadratic upper bounds around their minimizers, despite consuming only a static memory footprint of O(d2) for d model parameters, independent of the number of sequentially occurring tasks T. In the quadratic-loss setting, we obtain exact hindsight Pareto-optimal guarantees on forgetting. In the quadratic-upper-bound setting, forgetting is provably bounded, with the tightness of the forgetting bound being directly determined by the tightness of the quadratic bound on the loss function. Our numerical results validate our theoretical claims of convergence to the Pareto-optimal solution, and demonstrate that we consistently out-perform prior empirical methods while occupying lesser memory.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 May 2026.
Builds on
39 of 71 references.
References · 39
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,585
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,787
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,621
- 2017Gradient Episodic Memory for Continual Learningcited by 1,898
- 2017Memory Aware Synapses: Learning what (not) to forgetcited by 1,105
- 2018Efficient Lifelong Learning with A-GEMcited by 1,058
- 2020Dark Experience for General Continual Learning: a Strong, Simple Baselinecited by 911
- 2023A Survey on Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 909
- 2023A Comprehensive Survey of Continual Learning: Theory, Method and Applicationcited by 872
27 more
- 2019Fine-Grained Analysis of Optimization and Generalization for Overparameterized Two-Layer Neural Networkscited by 566
- 2019Online Continual Learning with Maximally Interfered Retrievalcited by 379
- 2021Gradient Projection Memory for Continual Learningcited by 348
- 2020Federated Continual Learning with Weighted Inter-client Transfercited by 161
- 2022Federated Class-Incremental Learningcited by 127
- 2020Optimal Continual Learning has Perfect Memory and is NP-hardcited by 87
- 2022TRGP: Trust Region Gradient Projection for Continual Learningcited by 82
- 2022How catastrophic can catastrophic forgetting be in linear regression?cited by 81
- 2021Rehearsal revealed: The limits and merits of revisiting samples in continual learningcited by 76
- 2023Theory on Forgetting and Generalization of Continual Learningcited by 72
- 2023TARGET: Federated Class-Continual Learning via Exemplar-Free Distillationcited by 65
- 2022Beyond Not-Forgetting: Continual Learning with Backward Knowledge Transfercited by 59
- 2020Federated Learning Meets Multi-objective Optimizationcited by 53
- 2023Federated Continual Learning via Knowledge Fusion: A Surveycited by 53
- 2021A distillation-based approach integrating continual learning and federated learning for pervasive servicescited by 42
- 2021Non-IID data and Continual Learning processes in Federated Learning: A long road aheadcited by 36
- 2023The Ideal Continual Learner: An Agent That Never Forgetscited by 35
- 2023Asynchronous Federated Continual Learningcited by 29
- 2025The Future of Continual Learning in the Era of Foundation Models: Three Key Directionscited by 17
- 2021On the Generalization Power of Overfitted Two-Layer Neural Tangent Kernel Modelscited by 13
- 2019Towards Understanding the Transferability of Deep Representationscited by 12
- 2025From Continual Learning to SGD and Back: Better Rates for Continual Linear Modelscited by 12
- 2024Federated Continual Learning for Edge-AI: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 11
- 2025Optimal Rates in Continual Linear Regression via Increasing Regularizationcited by 8
- 2024On the Convergence of Continual Learning with Adaptive Methodscited by 7
- 2024On the Convergence of Continual Federated Learning Using Incrementally Aggregated Gradientscited by 5
- 2025Pareto Continual Learning: Preference-Conditioned Learning and Adaption for Dynamic Stability-Plasticity Trade-offcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.