TwinRouterBench: Fast Static and Live Dynamic Evaluation for Realistic Agentic LLM Routing
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks
Abstract (arXiv)
LLM routing matters most in long-horizon applications such as coding agents, deep research systems, and computer-use agents, where a single user request triggers many model calls. Routing each call to the cheapest sufficient model can cut costs without sacrificing quality, yet existing router benchmarks evaluate routers only on one-shot prompts. They never expose the router-visible prefix at an intermediate agent step, never test whether a cheaper replacement preserves downstream task success, and often rely on online LLM judges at evaluation time. We introduce TwinRouterBench, a step-level routing benchmark with two tracks. The static track provides 970 router-visible prefixes from 520 instances across SWE-bench, BFCL, mtRAG, QMSum, and PinchBench, each paired with an execution-verified target tier estimated under a released downgrade-and-cascade protocol; scoring is deterministic arithmetic over tier labels, trajectory membership, and token costs, with no online evaluator-side LLM judge. The dynamic track supplies a harness that runs routers on the full 500-case SWE-bench Verified suite; in this paper we report a 100-case held-out evaluation disjoint from the static SWE supervision split. At each LLM call the router selects a concrete model from a locked pool, and success is measured by official task resolution and realized API spend. The two tracks support fast offline iteration followed by end-to-end validation under live agent execution. Code and data are available at https://github.com/CommonstackAI/TwinRouterBench.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 17 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 May 2026.
Builds on
17 of 24 references.
References · 17
- 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,386
- 2023FrugalGPT: How to Use Large Language Models While Reducing Cost and Improving Performancecited by 853
- 2024RouteLLM: Learning to Route LLMs with Preference Datacited by 682
- 2024Hybrid LLM: Cost-Efficient and Quality-Aware Query Routingcited by 372
- 2021QMSum: A New Benchmark for Query-based Multi-domain Meeting Summarizationcited by 365
- 2024RouterBench: A Benchmark for Multi-LLM Routing Systemcited by 238
- 2024GraphRouter: A Graph-based Router for LLM Selectionscited by 165
- 2023AutoMix: Automatically Mixing Language Modelscited by 125
- 2024TensorOpera Router: A Multi-Model Router for Efficient LLM Inferencecited by 60
- 2025MTRAG: A Multi-Turn Conversational Benchmark for Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systemscited by 51
- 2026LLMRouterBench: A Massive Benchmark and Unified Framework for LLM Routingcited by 38
- 2025RouterArena: An Open Platform for Comprehensive Comparison of LLM Routerscited by 22
5 more
- 2025Doing More with Less: A Survey on Routing Strategies for Resource Optimisation in Large Language Model-Based Systemscited by 20
- 2024RAD-Bench: Evaluating Large Language Models Capabilities in Retrieval Augmented Dialoguescited by 19
- 2026TRIM: Hybrid Inference via Targeted Stepwise Routing in Multi-Step Reasoning Taskscited by 8
- 2026vLLM Semantic Router: Signal Driven Decision Routing for Mixture-of-Modality Modelscited by 6
- 2026Triage: Routing Software Engineering Tasks to Cost-Effective LLM Tiers via Code Quality Signalscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 6.
6 papers.
- 2026The Replay Gap: Static Evaluation of Model Switching in LLM Agents Scores the Wrong Worldcited by 8
- 2026Agentic Routing: The Harness-Native Data Flywheelcited by 4
- 2026Toward Workflow-Aware Benchmarking for Healthcare NLP Agentscited by 1
- 2026Dynamic LLM Routers are Often Misguidedcited by 1
- 2026What Can Component-Replacement Evidence Establish? A Critical Scoping Review of Local Decisions in LLM Agentscited by 0
- 2026Handoff Curves: Initial Selection, Later Handoff, and Supervision Targets in Multi-turn LLM Routingcited by 0
- 2026Handoff Curves: Initial Selection, Later Handoff, and Supervision Targets in Multi-turn LLM Routing11 Oct 2026
- 2026Dynamic LLM Routers are Often Misguided2 Oct 2026
- 2026What Can Component-Replacement Evidence Establish? A Critical Scoping Review of Local Decisions in LLM Agents30 Sep 2026
- 2026Toward Workflow-Aware Benchmarking for Healthcare NLP Agents31 Aug 2026
- 2026The Replay Gap: Static Evaluation of Model Switching in LLM Agents Scores the Wrong World8 Aug 2026
- 2026Agentic Routing: The Harness-Native Data Flywheel13 Jul 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Agent-as-a-Router: Agentic Model Routing for Coding Tasks
- 2026RouteJudge: An Open Platform for Reproducible and Preference-Aware LLM Routing
- 2026Learning Agent Routing From Early Experience
- 2026Task- and Session-Level Model Routing: A Common-Interface Hybrid Evaluation of Four Open-Source Routers Across Four Benchmarks
- 2026RSI-Router: Evolving Subtask-Level LLM Routing and Skills for Cost-Efficient Agents
- 2026Benchmark Test-Time Scaling of General LLM Agents
- 2026Towards Fair and Comprehensive Evaluation of Routers in Collaborative LLM Systems
- 2025MasRouter: Learning to Route LLMs for Multi-Agent Systems