mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

STT-Arena: A More Realistic Environment for Tool-Using with Spatio-Temporal Dynamics

arXiv 2605.18548 ↗First posted 18 May 2026cs.CL cs.AIcited by 4

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Tool learning and function calling

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) deployed in real-world agentic applications must be capable of replanning and adapting when mid-task disruptions invalidate their prior decisions. Existing dynamic benchmarks primarily measure whether LLMs can detect temporal changes in a timely manner, leaving the complementary challenge of adaptive replanning under spatio-temporal dynamics largely unexplored. We introduce STT-Arena (Spatio-Temporal Tool-Use Arena), a benchmark of 227 high-quality interactive tasks spanning nine spatio-temporal conflict types and four solvability levels. Each task is grounded in a realistic, executable environment equipped with injected spatio-temporal triggers that can abruptly invalidate an ongoing plan, forcing the model to detect the state shift and construct a revised execution strategy. Extensive evaluation of frontier LLMs reveals that even the SOTA proprietary models, including Claude-4.6-Opus, achieves less than 40% overall accuracies, highlighting the fundamental difficulty of spatio-temporal dynamic reasoning. Systematic analysis of failure trajectories uncovers three recurring error modes of existing models: Stale-State Execution, Misdiagnosis of Dynamic Triggers, and Missing Post-Adaptation Verification. Guided by these findings, we propose an iterative trajectory refinement technique that eliminates these failure patterns from training data, and combine it with online RL to produce STT-Agent-4B which outperforms frontier LLMs on STT-Arena.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Tool learning and function calling, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. First posted on arXiv 18 May 2026.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025TRAJECT-Bench:A Trajectory-Aware Benchmark for Evaluating Agentic Tool Use
  2. 2025USTBench: Benchmarking and Dissecting Spatiotemporal Reasoning of LLMs as Urban Agents
  3. 2026What Do Agents Learn from Trajectory-SFT: Semantics or Interfaces?
  4. 2026STAR: Failure-Aware Markovian Routing for Multi-Agent Spatiotemporal Reasoning
  5. 2023Can Large Language Models be Good Path Planners? A Benchmark and Investigation on Spatial-temporal Reasoning
  6. 2026Action-Space Shaping for LLM Agents: Measuring and Mitigating Tool-Schema Bias
  7. 2026AgentProcessBench: Diagnosing Step-Level Process Quality in Tool-Using Agents
  8. 2025On the Limits of Innate Planning in Large Language Models