mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Surface-Form Neural Sparse Retrieval: Robust Fuzzy Matching for Industrial Music Search

arXiv 2605.17762 ↗First posted 18 May 2026cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Music search at the scale of Amazon Music presents a unique challenge: queries frequently deviate from indexed metadata due to misspellings, transpositions, and phonetic variations, yet the retrieval system must operate under strict millisecond-level latency constraints. Our existing learning-to-retrieve system, the High Confidence Index (HCI), learns query-entity associations from customer behavior, relying on continual ``exploration'' to choose candidates. Traditional n-gram matching enables this exploration but suffers from poor semantic robustness and high noise, limiting the system's ability to learn from long-tail queries. In this work, we present a robust neural sparse retrieval system designed to maximize exploration efficiency. We adapt a state-of-the-art inference-free sparse retrieval architecture to the music domain, combining it with an effective domain-specific granular subword tokenization strategy. Our approach utilizes short-length token constraints (max 3 chars) to enforce the learning of surface-form robustness over lexical memorization. By pre-computing the neural embeddings and term expansions during the offline indexing phase, online processing is reduced to minimal tokenization and IDF weighting, achieving effectively zero latency overhead for query encoding. Evaluations on a 6M-document production corpus show an aggregate 91.4% recall@10 (vs. 57.7% for trigrams) at comparable throughput. Simulation of the HCI feedback loop demonstrates improved exploration efficiency, with +0.8% higher stabilized recall than production trigrams. Ablation studies indicate that our sparse training methodology drives the performance gains, while domain-specific pretraining provides a cost-effective alternative to large-scale general-purpose pretraining.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 May 2026.

Builds on

17 of 26 references.

References · 17

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,824
  3. 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,918
  4. 2017Billion-scale similarity search with GPUscited by 2,497
  5. 2018SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processingcited by 1,989
  6. 2016Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Informationcited by 1,583
  7. 2020Don't Stop Pretraining: Adapt Language Models to Domains and Taskscited by 1,565
  8. 2019SciBERT: A Pretrained Language Model for Scientific Textcited by 1,414
  9. 2016Efficient and robust approximate nearest neighbor search using Hierarchical Navigable Small World graphscited by 861
  10. 2018Subword Regularization: Improving Neural Network Translation Models with Multiple Subword Candidatescited by 639
  11. 2021SPLADE: Sparse Lexical and Expansion Model for First Stage Rankingcited by 286
  12. 2022From Distillation to Hard Negative Sampling: Making Sparse Neural IR Models More Effectivecited by 98
5 more
  1. 2020CharacterBERT: Reconciling ELMo and BERT for Word-Level Open-Vocabulary Representations From Characterscited by 87
  2. 2024SPLADE-v3: New baselines for SPLADEcited by 72
  3. 2020Minimizing FLOPs to Learn Efficient Sparse Representationscited by 46
  4. 2024Towards Competitive Search Relevance For Inference-Free Learned Sparse Retrieverscited by 8
  5. 2025Effective Inference-Free Retrieval for Learned Sparse Representationscited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.