Do LLM Agents Mirror Socio-Cognitive Effects in Power-Asymmetric Conversations?
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Social simulation and multi-agent debate
Abstract (arXiv)
Power differences shape human communication through well documented socio cognitive effects, including language coordination, pronoun usage, authority bias, and harmful compliance. We examine whether large language models (LLMs) exhibit similar behaviors when assigned high or low status personas. Using personas from diverse professions, we simulate multi turn, power asymmetric dialogues (e.g., principal teacher, justice lawyer) and measure (i) language coordination, (ii) pronoun usage, (iii) persuasion success, and (iv) compliance with unsafe requests. Our results show that LLMs show key socio-cognitive effects of power, albeit with nuances and variability, linking simulated interactions to both desirable and unsafe behaviors.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Social simulation and multi-agent debate, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 23 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 May 2026.
Builds on
23 of 54 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 22
- 2022Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledgecited by 1,807
- 2023CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model Societycited by 1,348
- 2023Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Modelscited by 988
- 2022Out of One, Many: Using Language Models to Simulate Human Samplescited by 737
- 2023Capabilities of GPT-4 on Medical Challenge Problemscited by 630
- 2024How Johnny Can Persuade LLMs to Jailbreak Them: Rethinking Persuasion to Challenge AI Safety by Humanizing LLMscited by 533
- 2024Scaling Synthetic Data Creation with 1,000,000,000 Personascited by 397
- 2023Toxicity in ChatGPT: Analyzing Persona-assigned Language Modelscited by 356
- 2023SOTOPIA: Interactive Evaluation for Social Intelligence in Language Agentscited by 350
- 2023Do-Not-Answer: A Dataset for Evaluating Safeguards in LLMscited by 176
- 2023Do LLMs exhibit human-like response biases? A case study in survey designcited by 176
- 2024Cognitive Bias in Decision-Making with LLMscited by 104
10 more
- 2024Is this the real life? Is this just fantasy? The Misleading Success of Simulating Social Interactions With LLMscited by 59
- 2021Few-shot Language Coordination by Modeling Theory of Mindcited by 32
- 2024Large Language Models Show Human-like Social Desirability Biases in Survey Responsescited by 27
- 2025Unmasking Implicit Bias: Evaluating Persona-Prompted LLM Responses in Power-Disparate Social Scenarioscited by 25
- 2025Beware of Your Po! Measuring and Mitigating AI Safety Risks in Role-Play Fine-Tuning of LLMscited by 22
- 2024Do Language Models Exhibit the Same Cognitive Biases in Problem Solving as Human Learners?cited by 19
- 2024LLM Roleplay: Simulating Human-Chatbot Interactioncited by 15
- 2024Large Language Models Fall Short: Understanding Complex Relationships in Detective Narrativescited by 14
- 2025The Rise of Darkness: Safety-Utility Trade-Offs in Role-Playing Dialogue Agentscited by 7
- 2025Beyond One-Way Influence: Bidirectional Opinion Dynamics in Multi-Turn Human-LLM Interactionscited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Collective Opinion Dynamics in Structured LLM Populations
- 2025Computational Basis of LLM's Decision Making in Social Simulation
- 2025Are LLM Agents Behaviorally Coherent? Latent Profiles for Social Simulation
- 2024Systematic Biases in LLM Simulations of Debates
- 2025Are Human Interactions Replicable by Generative Agents? A Case Study on Pronoun Usage in Hierarchical Interactions
- 2024LLM Agents in Interaction: Measuring Personality Consistency and Linguistic Alignment in Interacting Populations of Large Language Models
- 2026LLMs Trust Their Own: Identity-Dependent Conformity in Multi-Agent Systems
- 2026Large Language Models Exhibit Normative Conformity