mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Neural Tangent Kernel for Classification

arXiv 2605.17606 ↗First posted 17 May 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In wide neural networks, the Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) remains approximately constant during training, providing a powerful theoretical tool for studying training dynamics, generalization, and connections to kernel methods. However, this theory is largely restricted to regression losses. It was previously thought that training on a classification loss, or more generally losses involving nonlinear output transformations, breaks this property, leading to divergent logits and a breakdown of the linearization. In this paper, we extend NTK theory to classification by identifying conditions under which wide neural networks remain in the lazy training regime. We show that parameter-space regularization ensures a constant NTK during training for cross-entropy loss, while in the absence of regularization the regime is recovered when targets are non-degenerate, i.e. when all classes have strictly positive probability. Under these conditions, training is well-approximated by the linearized model, yielding an explicit characterization of the solution in terms of the NTK. We further analyze the distribution of trained predictors induced by random initialization and relate this notion of model uncertainty to Bayesian methods.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 May 2026.

Builds on

28 of 30 references.

References · 28

  1. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  2. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
  3. 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 985
  4. 2019Wide Neural Networks of Any Depth Evolve as Linear Models Under Gradient Descentcited by 732
  5. 2020Prevalence of Neural Collapse during the terminal phase of deep learning trainingcited by 713
  6. 2017The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Datacited by 649
  7. 2017Deep Neural Networks as Gaussian Processescited by 617
  8. 2018Gradient Descent Finds Global Minima of Deep Neural Networkscited by 572
  9. 2019On Exact Computation with an Infinitely Wide Neural Netcited by 572
  10. 2018A Mean Field View of the Landscape of Two-Layers Neural Networkscited by 463
  11. 2018Gaussian Process Behaviour in Wide Deep Neural Networkscited by 314
  12. 2019Gradient Descent Maximizes the Margin of Homogeneous Neural Networkscited by 308
16 more
  1. 2020Loss landscapes and optimization in over-parameterized non-linear systems and neural networkscited by 231
  2. 2019Generalization Bounds of Stochastic Gradient Descent for Wide and Deep Neural Networkscited by 221
  3. 2020Directional convergence and alignment in deep learningcited by 172
  4. 2014A* Samplingcited by 150
  5. 2020Tensor Programs II: Neural Tangent Kernel for Any Architecturecited by 139
  6. 2020On the linearity of large non-linear models: when and why the tangent kernel is constantcited by 129
  7. 2020Bayesian Deep Ensembles via the Neural Tangent Kernelcited by 90
  8. 2018Overparameterized Nonlinear Learning: Gradient Descent Takes the Shortest Path?cited by 87
  9. 2021An Unconstrained Layer-Peeled Perspective on Neural Collapsecited by 87
  10. 2022Imbalance Trouble: Revisiting Neural-Collapse Geometrycited by 80
  11. 2020On the training dynamics of deep networks with L2 regularizationcited by 38
  12. 2023On the Eigenvalue Decay Rates of a Class of Neural-Network Related Kernel Functions Defined on General Domainscited by 30
  13. 2024The Positivity of the Neural Tangent Kernelcited by 12
  14. 2025A Gaussian Process View on Observation Noise and Initialization in Wide Neural Networkscited by 5
  15. 2026Richer Bayesian Last Layers with Subsampled NTK Featurescited by 3
  16. 2025Diagonalizing the Softmax: Hadamard Initialization for Tractable Cross-Entropy Dynamicscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.