Richer Bayesian Last Layers with Subsampled NTK Features
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Bayesian Last Layers (BLLs) provide a convenient and computationally efficient way to estimate uncertainty in neural networks. However, they underestimate epistemic uncertainty because they apply a Bayesian treatment only to the final layer, ignoring uncertainty induced by earlier layers. We propose a method that improves BLLs by leveraging a projection of Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) features onto the space spanned by the last-layer features. This enables posterior inference that accounts for variability of the full network while retaining the low computational cost of inference of a standard BLL. We show that our method yields posterior variances that are provably greater or equal to those of a standard BLL, correcting its tendency to underestimate epistemic uncertainty. To further reduce computational cost, we introduce a uniform subsampling scheme for estimating the projection matrix and for posterior inference. We derive approximation bounds for both types of subsampling. Empirical evaluations on UCI regression, contextual bandits, image classification, and out-of-distribution detection tasks in image and tabular datasets, demonstrate improved calibration and uncertainty estimates compared to standard BLLs and competitive baselines, while reducing computational cost.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Feb 2026.
Builds on
34 of 50 references.
References · 34
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
- 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,321
- 2015Optimizing Neural Networks with Kronecker-factored Approximate Curvaturecited by 776
- 2019Wide Neural Networks of Any Depth Evolve as Linear Models Under Gradient Descentcited by 732
- 2019On Exact Computation with an Infinitely Wide Neural Netcited by 572
- 2019A Simple Baseline for Bayesian Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 555
- 2020Simple and Principled Uncertainty Estimation with Deterministic Deep Learning via Distance Awarenesscited by 389
- 2021Laplace Redux -- Effortless Bayesian Deep Learningcited by 359
- 2017Snapshot Ensembles: Train 1, get M for freecited by 349
22 more
- 2014Stochastic Gradient Hamiltonian Monte Carlocited by 341
- 2018Gaussian Process Behaviour in Wide Deep Neural Networkscited by 314
- 2021What Are Bayesian Neural Network Posteriors Really Like?cited by 307
- 2015Scalable Bayesian Optimization Using Deep Neural Networkscited by 284
- 2020Being Bayesian, Even Just a Bit, Fixes Overconfidence in ReLU Networkscited by 227
- 2021Deep Deterministic Uncertainty: A Simple Baselinecited by 200
- 2020Feature Learning in Infinite-Width Neural Networkscited by 182
- 2015Kernel Interpolation for Scalable Structured Gaussian Processes (KISS-GP)cited by 175
- 2020Bayesian Deep Ensembles via the Neural Tangent Kernelcited by 90
- 2024Variational Bayesian Last Layerscited by 67
- 2019Challenges in Markov chain Monte Carlo for Bayesian neural networkscited by 43
- 2022Accelerated Linearized Laplace Approximation for Bayesian Deep Learningcited by 27
- 2022Characterizing the Spectrum of the NTK via a Power Series Expansioncited by 22
- 2021Spectral Analysis of the Neural Tangent Kernel for Deep Residual Networkscited by 20
- 2024Reparameterization invariance in approximate Bayesian inferencecited by 17
- 2025Uncertainty Quantification with the Empirical Neural Tangent Kernelcited by 11
- 2024Uncertainty Modeling in Graph Neural Networks via Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 8
- 2025A Gaussian Process View on Observation Noise and Initialization in Wide Neural Networkscited by 5
- 2025laplax -- Laplace Approximations with JAXcited by 5
- 2024Fixed-Mean Gaussian Processes for Post-hoc Bayesian Deep Learningcited by 2
- 2025Post-Hoc Uncertainty Quantification in Pre-Trained Neural Networks via Activation-Level Gaussian Processescited by 2
- 2025Gradient Prediction with Control Variates in the Cheap-Forward Regimecited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026Is the Last Layer Sufficient for Uncertainty Quantification?cited by 1
- 2026Beliefs Beyond Posteriors: The Predictive Cost of ELBO Bindingcited by 0
- 2026The Neural Tangent Kernel for Classificationcited by 0
- 2026Is the Last Layer Sufficient for Uncertainty Quantification?29 May 2026
- 2026The Neural Tangent Kernel for Classification17 May 2026
- 2026Beliefs Beyond Posteriors: The Predictive Cost of ELBO Binding8 May 2026