Leveraging Error Diversity in Group Rollouts for Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Reinforcement Learning from Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) typically samples multiple responses per prompt and assigns binary rewards based on individual correctness, yet the collective structure of the group output, specifically the distribution of errors, is largely discarded. We identify this as a missed opportunity: empirical analysis reveals that error diversity within a group is a strong predictor of training success, with problems eliciting diverse wrong answers benefiting substantially more from RLVR than those producing homogeneous failures. Motivated by this observation, we propose Error Diversity Advantage Shaping (EDAS), a lightweight, algorithm-agnostic technique that modulates the advantage signal for incorrect rollouts based on intra-group error diversity. EDAS amplifies penalties for dominant, repeated errors and attenuates penalties for rare, exploratory ones, thereby encouraging the model to maintain diverse reasoning paths and discouraging error perseveration. Crucially, EDAS operates as a simple post-hoc adjustment that can be seamlessly integrated into any RLVR algorithm. We validate EDAS on top of several mainstream RLVR methods across a series of models and seven challenging math benchmarks, demonstrating consistent improvements. Notably, EDAS yields an average improvement of 6.29 points over DAPO on Qwen3-8B across seven benchmarks, confirming that exploiting the latent information in group rollouts is a broadly effective strategy for strengthening RLVR.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 May 2026.
Builds on
25 of 34 references.
References · 25
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
- 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
- 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scalecited by 2,678
- 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 1,906
- 2023Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 1,332
- 2024OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problemscited by 1,099
- 2025Reasoning with Exploration: An Entropy Perspectivecited by 277
- 2025MathArena: Evaluating LLMs on Uncontaminated Math Competitionscited by 275
- 2025CodeElo: Benchmarking Competition-level Code Generation of LLMs with Human-comparable Elo Ratingscited by 109
13 more
- 2025Pass@K Policy Optimization: Solving Harder Reinforcement Learning Problemscited by 83
- 2025EDGE-GRPO: Entropy-Driven GRPO with Guided Error Correction for Advantage Diversitycited by 41
- 2025Unlocking Exploration in RLVR: Uncertainty-aware Advantage Shaping for Deeper Reasoningcited by 34
- 2025NGRPO: Negative-enhanced Group Relative Policy Optimizationcited by 31
- 2025Interleaved Latent Visual Reasoning with Selective Perceptual Modelingcited by 30
- 2026Harder Is Better: Boosting Mathematical Reasoning via Difficulty-Aware GRPO and Multi-Aspect Question Reformulationcited by 18
- 2026SetPO: Set-Level Policy Optimization for Diversity-Preserving LLM Reasoningcited by 9
- 2026Reinforced Efficient Reasoning via Semantically Diverse Explorationcited by 8
- 2025Reasoning through Exploration: A Reinforcement Learning Framework for Robust Function Callingcited by 7
- 2025RSPO: Risk-Seeking Policy Optimization for Pass@k and Max@k Metrics in Large Language Modelscited by 5
- 2026Grouter: Decoupling Routing from Representation for Accelerated MoE Trainingcited by 5
- 2025Distributional Biases in Post-Training: A Markovian Analysis of Reasoning Trajectoriescited by 3
- 2026MMR-GRPO: Accelerating GRPO-Style Training through Diversity-Aware Reward Reweightingcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Overconfident Errors Need Stronger Correction: Asymmetric Confidence Penalties for Reinforcement Learning
- 2026Your Group-Relative Advantage Is Biased
- 2025Don't Waste Mistakes: Leveraging Negative RL-Groups via Confidence Reweighting
- 2026Early Verdicts, Better Budgets: Sequential Adaptive Rollout Allocation for Compute-Efficient RLVR
- 2026Delay, Plateau, or Collapse: Evaluating the Impact of Systematic Verification Error on RLVR
- 2026Uniform-Correct Policy Optimization: Breaking RLVR's Indifference to Diversity
- 2026Rethinking Groups in Critic-Free RLVR
- 2026Luck Is Not Skill: When Do Paired Rollouts Help Group-Relative RL of LLM Agents?