Defining Cultural Capabilities for AI Evaluation: A Taxonomy Grounded in Intercultural Communication Theory
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Tremendous efforts have been put into evaluating the inclusivity and effectiveness of AI systems across cultures. However, the cultural capabilities considered in much of the literature remain vaguely defined, are referred to using interchangeable terminology, and are typically limited to recalling accurate information about various demographics, regions, and nationalities. To address this construct ambiguity, we draw from Intercultural Communication scholarship and propose a three-level taxonomy of AI-relevant cultural capabilities: Cultural Awareness answers "Does the model know?", Cultural Sensitivity answers "How does it frame its knowledge?", and Cultural Competence answers "Can it adapt as the interaction evolves?". Beyond conceptual clarification, we position this taxonomy as a practical tool for improving the validity and interpretability of AI evaluation in real-world, multicultural settings. Without such construct clarity, evaluation results risk overstating model capabilities and may lead to inappropriate deployment decisions in culturally sensitive contexts.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 May 2026.
Builds on
19 of 65 references.
References · 19
- 2022Challenges and Strategies in Cross-Cultural NLPcited by 218
- 2024BLEnD: A Benchmark for LLMs on Everyday Knowledge in Diverse Cultures and Languagescited by 173
- 2024Towards Measuring and Modeling "Culture" in LLMs: A Surveycited by 167
- 2024Survey of Cultural Awareness in Language Models: Text and Beyondcited by 103
- 2024INCLUDE: Evaluating Multilingual Language Understanding with Regional Knowledgecited by 86
- 2021A Survey of Race, Racism, and Anti-Racism in NLPcited by 75
- 2023Benchmarking Machine Translation with Cultural Awarenesscited by 53
- 2024Evaluating Cultural and Social Awareness of LLM Web Agentscited by 45
- 2025Culture is Not Trivia: Sociocultural Theory for Cultural NLPcited by 40
- 2021Understanding and Countering Stereotypes: A Computational Approach to the Stereotype Content Modelcited by 23
- 2025On The Origin of Cultural Biases in Language Models: From Pre-training Data to Linguistic Phenomenacited by 22
- 2024JMMMU: A Japanese Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding Benchmark for Culture-aware Evaluationcited by 19
7 more
- 2025Meta-Cultural Competence: Climbing the Right Hill of Cultural Awarenesscited by 8
- 2025Nunchi-Bench: Benchmarking Language Models on Cultural Reasoning with a Focus on Korean Superstitioncited by 6
- 2025Culturally-Aware Conversations: A Framework & Benchmark for LLMscited by 5
- 2024Adaptable Moral Stances of Large Language Models on Sexist Content: Implications for Society and Gender Discoursecited by 4
- 2025Mind the Gesture: Evaluating AI Sensitivity to Culturally Offensive Non-Verbal Gesturescited by 4
- 2024Challenging Negative Gender Stereotypes: A Study on the Effectiveness of Automated Counter-Stereotypescited by 3
- 2025NormGenesis: Multicultural Dialogue Generation via Exemplar-Guided Social Norm Modeling and Violation Recoverycited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Supporting and Performing Culture from the Insidecited by 0
- 2026Supporting and Performing Culture from the Inside26 Sep 2026