mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning Context-conditioned Gaussian Overbounds for Convolution-Based Uncertainty Propagation

arXiv 2605.15789 ↗First posted 15 May 2026cs.LG eess.SP stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Uncertainty quantification is essential in safety-critical settings--from autonomous driving to aviation, finance, and health--where decisions must rely on conservative bounds rather than point estimates. Predictor-level intervals (e.g., from quantile regression, conformal prediction, variance networks, or Bayesian models) generally do not compose: adding two per-variable intervals need not yield a valid interval for their sum or preserve coverage. In aviation, Gaussian overbounding replaces complex error distributions with a conservative Gaussian whose tails dominate the truth, so conservatism propagates through linear operations. Yet classical overbounds are global, often overly conservative, and hard to adapt to feature-conditioned errors. We propose a unified learning framework that trains neural networks to produce context-aware Gaussian overbounds--mean and scale--with provable conservatism on a finite quantile grid and, under three explicit regularity assumptions, continuous-tail conservatism on a certified interval. Our overbounding loss enforces conservativeness at selected quantiles while penalizing distributional distance with a Wasserstein-style term. The learned bounds support conservative linear-combination and convolution analysis on the enforced grid, and on the certified interval when assumptions hold, while being less redundant than traditional methods. We provide a scoped analysis of discrete-to-continuous conservatism and compact-domain objective regularity, and validate on synthetic data and real-world datasets, including multipath, ionospheric, and tropospheric residual errors. Across these settings, the method yields tighter bounds while maintaining conservatism on the enforced grid and in experiments. The framework is modality-agnostic and applicable to learning systems that require conservative, feature-conditioned uncertainty estimates in dynamic environments.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 May 2026.

Builds on

15 of 47 references.

References · 15

  1. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
  2. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
  3. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
  4. 2021A Gentle Introduction to Conformal Prediction and Distribution-Free Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 792
  5. 2019Conformalized Quantile Regressioncited by 629
  6. 2020Uncertainty Quantification and Deep Ensemblescited by 139
  7. 2023A Survey on Uncertainty Quantification Methods for Deep Learningcited by 81
  8. 2020Beyond Pinball Loss: Quantile Methods for Calibrated Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 78
  9. 2019Reliable training and estimation of variance networkscited by 63
  10. 2020Calibrated Reliable Regression using Maximum Mean Discrepancycited by 36
  11. 2022Ensemble Conformalized Quantile Regression for Probabilistic Time Series Forecastingcited by 27
  12. 2024Conformal Prediction: A Data Perspectivecited by 25
3 more
  1. 2023Conformal Loss-Controlling Predictioncited by 3
  2. 2023Adaptive Sparse Gaussian Processcited by 3
  3. 2022Improving Uncertainty Quantification of Variance Networks by Tree-Structured Learningcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.