VLMs Trace Without Tracking: Diagnosing Failures in Visual Path Following
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Vision-language models (VLMs) achieve strong performance on multimodal benchmarks, but may still lack robust control over basic visual operations. We study textitline tracing, where a model must follow a selected visual path through successive local continuations. To isolate this ability, we design controlled tracing tasks that introduce nearby competitors while reducing semantic and topological ambiguity such as crossings and overlaps. Across these tasks, even state-of-the-art VLMs frequently lose the target path and switch to nearby alternatives, especially when those alternatives look locally similar to the target. Behavioral interventions and internal analyses indicate that these failures arise from local competition: nearby similar distractors pull the model away from the true continuation. Standard remedies do not remove this bottleneck: model-size scaling provides only limited gains, reasoning partially compensates through costly substitute strategies, and explicit tracing instructions fail to recover stable path following. Finally, tests on tangled-cable scenes and metro maps with richer visual complexity show that the same path-switching failure persists beyond our controlled settings.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 30 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 May 2026.
Builds on
30 of 38 references.
Closest ancestors · 13
Same direction, newest first
- 2026TraversalBench: Challenging Paths to Follow for Vision Language Models13 Apr
- 2025VLMs have Tunnel Vision: Evaluating Nonlocal Visual Reasoning in Leading VLMs4 Jul
- 2025Visual symbolic mechanisms: Emergent symbol processing in vision language models18 Jun
- 2025Vision Language Models are Biased29 May
- 2025Why Vision Language Models Struggle with Visual Arithmetic? Towards Enhanced Chart and Geometry Understanding17 Feb
- 2024Probing Visual Language Priors in VLMs31 Dec
- 2024Understanding the Limits of Vision Language Models Through the Lens of the Binding Problem31 Oct
- 2024Do Vision-Language Models Really Understand Visual Language?30 Sep
- 2024Response Wide Shut: Surprising Observations in Basic Vision Language Model Capabilities13 Aug
- 2024Vision language models are blind: Failing to translate detailed visual features into words9 Jul
- 2024VLind-Bench: Measuring Language Priors in Large Vision-Language Models13 Jun
- 2024VisionGraph: Leveraging Large Multimodal Models for Graph Theory Problems in Visual Context8 May
Other references · 17
- 2023MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?cited by 2,141
- 2023MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGIcited by 2,080
- 2025InternVL3.5: Advancing Open-Source Multimodal Models in Versatility, Reasoning, and Efficiencycited by 1,510
- 2024Eyes Wide Shut? Exploring the Visual Shortcomings of Multimodal LLMscited by 735
- 2024SpatialVLM: Endowing Vision-Language Models with Spatial Reasoning Capabilitiescited by 706
- 2023HallusionBench: An Advanced Diagnostic Suite for Entangled Language Hallucination and Visual Illusion in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 583
- 2024BLINK: Multimodal Large Language Models Can See but Not Perceivecited by 550
- 2023What's "up" with vision-language models? Investigating their struggle with spatial reasoningcited by 254
- 2018Learning long-range spatial dependencies with horizontal gated-recurrent unitscited by 98
- 2025Why Is Spatial Reasoning Hard for VLMs? An Attention Mechanism Perspective on Focus Areascited by 95
- 2026BabyVision: Visual Reasoning Beyond Languagecited by 49
- 2024VisOnlyQA: Large Vision Language Models Still Struggle with Visual Perception of Geometric Informationcited by 39
5 more
- 2025RewardMap: Tackling Sparse Rewards in Fine-grained Visual Reasoning via Multi-Stage Reinforcement Learningcited by 21
- 2024Unraveling the Truth: Do VLMs really Understand Charts? A Deep Dive into Consistency and Robustnesscited by 17
- 2025Are They the Same? Exploring Visual Correspondence Shortcomings of Multimodal LLMscited by 16
- 2023HANDLOOM: Learned Tracing of One-Dimensional Objects for Inspection and Manipulationcited by 5
- 2025Do MLLMs Really Understand the Charts?cited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Where To Look? : Causal Tracing of Vision Encoders in VLM
- 2026TraceVision: Trajectory-Aware Vision-Language Model for Human-Like Spatial Understanding
- 2026Is Visual Prompting All You Need? Studying VLM Spatial Reasoning under Progressive Visual Scaffolds
- 2026Pathways of Visual Information Flow in Vision-Language Models
- 2026WOVEN: Weaving Visual World Modeling into Multimodal LLMs
- 2026VLA-Trace: Diagnosing Vision-Language-Action Models through Representation and Behavior Tracing
- 2024UniBench: Visual Reasoning Requires Rethinking Vision-Language Beyond Scaling
- 2024Evaluating Vision-Language Models as Evaluators in Path Planning