Quantum Feature Pyramid Gating for Seismic Image Segmentation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Accurate salt-body delineation is essential for seismic interpretation because salt structures distort wave propagation, complicate velocity-model building, obscure reservoir geometry, and increase uncertainty in exploration and drilling decisions. Although hybrid quantum-classical models have shown competitive performance on small-scale image-classification tasks, their value for dense, pixel-level geophysical prediction remains largely untested. This work introduces quantum feature gating, a hybrid segmentation architecture that embeds a parameterized quantum circuit (PQC) at feature-fusion points within an encoder-decoder pipeline. A 4-qubit, 2-layer PQC with data re-uploading computes a learned convex combination of lateral and top-down features at each Feature Pyramid Network merge point. A global-average-pooling layer maps encoder features to a fixed 4-dimensional quantum input, decoupling the 72-parameter quantum budget from backbone size and image resolution. The method is evaluated on the 2018 TGS Salt Identification Challenge using 4,000 seismic images at 101 x 101 resolution, across two integration topologies, eight circuit variants, and six encoders with 8M to 118M parameters under five-fold cross-validation. In a controlled EfficientNetV2-L ablation at 256 x 256 resolution, replacing the three Quantum FPN Gates with element-wise addition while holding the encoder, loss schedule, splits, and threshold search fixed reduces mean IoU from 0.9389 to 0.8404, a 9.85 percentage-point gap. Inserting the same circuit as skip-connection attention in a custom U-Net improves IoU by 0.88 points over the SolidUNet baseline, showing that the PQC contribution depends on where and what it gates. These results provide controlled evidence that quantum feature fusion can improve dense seismic segmentation.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 May 2026.
Builds on
19 of 36 references.
References · 19
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
- 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,036
- 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,789
- 2018CBAM: Convolutional Block Attention Modulecited by 2,477
- 2018Attention U-Net: Learning Where to Look for the Pancreascited by 1,435
- 2021EfficientNetV2: Smaller Models and Faster Trainingcited by 1,135
- 2019EfficientDet: Scalable and Efficient Object Detectioncited by 1,020
- 2018Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapescited by 630
- 2020The effect of data encoding on the expressive power of variational quantum machine learning modelscited by 333
- 2019Parameterized quantum circuits as machine learning modelscited by 332
- 2019Efficient Learning for Deep Quantum Neural Networkscited by 161
- 2018Pyramid Attention Network for Semantic Segmentationcited by 149
7 more
- 2019Transfer learning in hybrid classical-quantum neural networkscited by 114
- 2023Quantum machine learning for image classificationcited by 57
- 2019Support vector machines on the D-Wave quantum annealercited by 33
- 2023Q-Seg: Quantum Annealing-Based Unsupervised Image Segmentationcited by 11
- 2019Semi-Supervised Segmentation of Salt Bodies in Seismic Images using an Ensemble of Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 9
- 2023Quantum optimization algorithms for CT image segmentation from X-ray datacited by 4
- 2026HQF-Net: A Hybrid Quantum-Classical Multi-Scale Fusion Network for Remote Sensing Image Segmentationcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.