In-IDE Toolkit for Developers of AI-Based Features
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents
Abstract (arXiv)
AI-enabled features built on LLMs and agentic workflows are difficult to test, debug, and reproduce, especially for product-focused software engineers without a machine learning background. We present the AI Toolkit plugin for JetBrains IDEs, which brings tracing and evaluation directly into the Run/Debug loop. A mixed methods study with practitioners presents three consistent needs: (1) make evaluation regular and repeatable, (2) expose traces at the moment of execution, and (3) minimize setup and context switching. Guided by these needs, the AI Toolkit introduces an IDE-native workflow: run-triggered trace capture; immediate, hierarchical inspection; one-click "Add to Dataset" from traces; and unit-test-like evaluations with pluggable metrics. The first release in PyCharm shows promising early signals - strong conversion when promoted at Run, sustained usage among those who capture traces, and low churn - suggesting that IDE-native observability lowers activation energy and helps developers adopt disciplined practices. We detail the design and implementation of the AI Agents Debugger and AI Evaluation, report initial adoption telemetry, and outline next steps to broaden framework coverage and scale evaluations. Together, these results indicate that integrating AI observability and evaluation into everyday IDE workflows can make modern AI development accessible to non-ML specialists while preserving software-engineering practices.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 11 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 May 2026.
Builds on
11 of 33 references.
References · 11
- 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,423
- 2024Agent-as-a-Judge: Evaluate Agents with Agentscited by 238
- 2025Survey on Evaluation of LLM-based Agentscited by 204
- 2024Empowering Biomedical Discovery with AI Agentscited by 118
- 2025A Survey of WebAgents: Towards Next-Generation AI Agents for Web Automation with Large Foundation Modelscited by 87
- 2024Visibility into AI Agentscited by 79
- 2023Teach AI How to Code: Using Large Language Models as Teachable Agents for Programming Educationcited by 39
- 2024Building Better AI Agents: A Provocation on the Utilisation of Persona in LLM-based Conversational Agentscited by 26
- 2025AgentSight: System-Level Observability for AI Agents Using eBPFcited by 21
- 2024MMAU: A Holistic Benchmark of Agent Capabilities Across Diverse Domainscited by 19
- 2024JetTrain: IDE-Native Machine Learning Experimentscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Towards a Neural Debugger for Python
- 2026Between the Commits: Process, Error, and Claim Reliability in a Wholly AI-Authored Codebase
- 2025Interactive Debugging and Steering of Multi-Agent AI Systems
- 2026ABTest: Behavior-Driven Testing for AI Coding Agents
- 2026Harness Engineering for Agentic AI Coding Tools: An Exploratory Study
- 2025Fully Autonomous Programming using Iterative Multi-Agent Debugging with Large Language Models
- 2026Willful Disobedience: Automatically Detecting Failures in Agentic Traces
- 2025AI-Generated Code Is Not Reproducible (Yet): An Empirical Study of Dependency Gaps in LLM-Based Coding Agents