mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Locale-Conditioned Few-Shot Prompting Mitigates Demonstration Regurgitation in On-Device PII Substitution with Small Language Models

arXiv 2605.13538 ↗First posted 13 May 2026cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Personally Identifiable Information (PII) redaction usually replaces detected entities with placeholder tokens such as [PERSON], destroying the downstream utility of the redacted text for retrieval and Named Entity Recognition (NER) training. We propose a fully on-device pipeline that substitutes PII with consistent, type-preserving fake values: a 1.5 B mixture-of-experts token classifier (openai/privacy-filter) detects spans, a 1-bit Bonsai-1.7B Small Language Model (SLM) proposes contextual surrogates for names, addresses, and dates, and a rule-based generator (faker) handles patterned fields. We report a prompting finding more important than the quantization choice: with naive fixed three-shot demonstrations, the 1-bit SLM regurgitates demonstration outputs verbatim regardless of input; 1.58-bit Ternary-Bonsai-1.7B reproduces byte-identical failures, ruling out quantization as the cause. We fix this with locale-conditioned rotating few-shot demonstrations: a character-range heuristic picks a locale-pure pool and a per-input MD5 hash samples three demonstrations. With the fix, 482/482 unique Bonsai-1.7B calls succeed (no echoes) and produce locale-correct surrogates, although the SLM still copies from a small same-locale demonstration pool - a residual narrowness we quantify. On a 2000-document multilingual corpus, hybrid perplexity (PPL) beats faker in all six locales under a multilingual evaluator (XGLM-564M); length preservation is best-of-three in 4 of 6 locales. On downstream NER (400 train / 100 test, English), redact yields F1=0.000, faker 0.656, original 0.960; on a matched 160/40 subset including hybrid, faker (0.506) outperforms hybrid (0.346) at p < 0.001. We report this as an honest negative finding: SLM surrogates produce more natural text but a less varied training distribution, and downstream NER benefits more from variety than from naturalness.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 May 2026.

Builds on

7 of 23 references.

References · 7

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  3. 2022Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?cited by 1,434
  4. 2021Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Modelscited by 1,392
  5. 2021Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivitycited by 1,135
  6. 2024The Era of 1-bit LLMs: All Large Language Models are in 1.58 Bitscited by 308
  7. 2021Few-shot Learning with Multilingual Language Modelscited by 278

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Discovering Universal Activation Directions for PII Leakage in Language Models
  2. 2026Do LLMs Really Memorize Personally Identifiable Information? Revisiting PII Leakage with a Cue-Controlled Memorization Framework
  3. 2025R.R.: Unveiling LLM Training Privacy through Recollection and Ranking
  4. 2025Private Memorization Editing: Turning Memorization into a Defense to Strengthen Data Privacy in Large Language Models
  5. 2026PII-TRACE: A Benchmark for Context-Aware PII Detection in Multi-Turn LLM Conversations
  6. 2026Unintended Memorization of Sensitive Information in Fine-Tuned Language Models
  7. 2025LiteLMGuard: Seamless and Lightweight On-Device Prompt Filtering for Safeguarding Small Language Models against Quantization-induced Risks and Vulnerabilities
  8. 2026PIIGuard: Mitigating PII Harvesting under Adversarial Sanitization