SAGE: Scalable Automated Robustness Augmentation for LLM Knowledge Evaluation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) achieve strong performance on standard knowledge evaluation benchmarks, yet recent work shows that their knowledge capabilities remain brittle under question variants that test the same knowledge in different forms. Robustness augmentation of existing knowledge evaluation benchmarks is therefore necessary, but current LLM-assisted generate-then-verify pipelines are costly and difficult to scale due to low-yield variant generation and unreliable variant verification. We propose SAGE (Scalable Automated Generation of Robustness BEnchmarks), a framework for scalable robustness augmentation of knowledge evaluation benchmarks using fine-tuned smaller models. SAGE consists of VariantQual, a rubric-based verifier trained on human-labeled seed data, and VariantGen, a variant generator initialized with supervised fine-tuning and further optimized with reinforcement learning using VariantQual as the reward model. Experiments on HellaSwag show that SAGE constructs a large-scale robustness-augmented benchmark with quality comparable to the human-annotated HellaSwag-Pro at substantially lower cost, while the fine-tuned models further generalize to MMLU without benchmark-specific fine-tuning.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 May 2026.
Builds on
19 of 23 references.
References · 19
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
- 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,724
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,969
- 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,822
- 2019Universal Adversarial Triggers for Attacking and Analyzing NLPcited by 722
- 2017Adversarial Examples for Evaluating Reading Comprehension Systemscited by 571
- 2025Rubrics as Rewards: Reinforcement Learning Beyond Verifiable Domainscited by 366
7 more
- 2024SWIFT:A Scalable lightWeight Infrastructure for Fine-Tuningcited by 355
- 2023Reasoning or Reciting? Exploring the Capabilities and Limitations of Language Models Through Counterfactual Taskscited by 246
- 2023Distilling Script Knowledge from Large Language Models for Constrained Language Planningcited by 45
- 2023It's Not Easy Being Wrong: Large Language Models Struggle with Process of Elimination Reasoningcited by 12
- 2025HellaSwag-Pro: A Large-Scale Bilingual Benchmark for Evaluating the Robustness of LLMs in Commonsense Reasoningcited by 7
- 2021Beyond the Tip of the Iceberg: Assessing Coherence of Text Classifierscited by 5
- 2023How Much Consistency Is Your Accuracy Worth?cited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024SelfPrompt: Autonomously Evaluating LLM Robustness via Domain-Constrained Knowledge Guidelines and Refined Adversarial Prompts
- 2026LPDS: Evaluating LLM Robustness Through Logic-Preserving Difficulty Scaling
- 2025LLMs Cannot Reliably Judge (Yet?): A Comprehensive Assessment on the Robustness of LLM-as-a-Judge
- 2025JudgeAgent: Beyond Static Benchmarks for Knowledge-Driven and Dynamic LLM Evaluation
- 2024RUPBench: Benchmarking Reasoning Under Perturbations for Robustness Evaluation in Large Language Models
- 2024Autonomous Evaluation of LLMs for Truth Maintenance and Reasoning Tasks
- 2025STEM: Efficient Relative Capability Evaluation of LLMs through Structured Transition Samples
- 2025FLUKE: A Linguistically-Driven and Task-Agnostic Framework for Robustness Evaluation