A Theory of Time-Sensitive Language Generation: Sparse Hallucination Beats Mode Collapse
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study language generation in the limit under a global preference ordering on strings, as introduced by Kleinberg and Wei. As is done in previous work, we aim for breadth, but impose an additional requirement of timeliness: higher-ranked strings should be generated earlier. A string is then only credited if it is generated before a deadline, where its deadline is defined by a function that maps a string's rank in the target language to the time by which it must be produced. This is in keeping with a central consideration in machine learning, where inductive bias favors ``simpler'' or ``more plausible'' outputs, all else being equal. We show that timely generation is impossible in a strong sense for eventually consistent generators -- the protagonists of most prior related work. Under what is perhaps the mildest natural relaxation of consistency, a hallucination rate that vanishes over time, we show that we can circumvent our impossibility result. In particular, we can achieve optimal density with respect to any superlinear deadline function. We also show this is tight by ruling out timely generation with linear deadlines and vanishing hallucination rate.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 May 2026.
Builds on
18 of 24 references.
References · 18
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2022PAL: Program-aided Language Modelscited by 652
- 2021MAUVE: Measuring the Gap Between Neural Text and Human Text using Divergence Frontierscited by 470
- 2017Towards Principled Methods for Training Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 464
- 2023Calibrated Language Models Must Hallucinatecited by 115
- 2024Language Generation in the Limitcited by 40
- 2024Generation through the lens of learning theorycited by 31
- 2024Exploring Facets of Language Generation in the Limitcited by 28
- 2025Density Measures for Language Generationcited by 21
- 2025Generation from Noisy Examplescited by 20
- 2025Representative Language Generationcited by 19
- 2025On Union-Closedness of Language Generationcited by 17
6 more
- 2025Language Generation in the Limit: Noise, Loss, and Feedbackcited by 16
- 2025(Im)possibility of Automated Hallucination Detection in Large Language Modelscited by 15
- 2024On Characterizations for Language Generation: Interplay of Hallucinations, Breadth, and Stabilitycited by 14
- 2025Language Generation and Identification From Partial Enumeration: Tight Density Bounds and Topological Characterizationscited by 13
- 2025Pareto-optimal Non-uniform Language Generationcited by 10
- 2024EscapeBench: Towards Advancing Creative Intelligence of Language Model Agentscited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026Flood and Harvest: The Provable Necessity of Trivia for Generating Valuable Mathematics via the Lens of Language Generation in the Limitcited by 2
- 2026Hallucination Rates in Language Generationcited by 0
- 2026GenLimitLib: A Formal Library for Language Generation in the Limit and AI-Assisted Mathematical Researchcited by 0
- 2026GenLimitLib: A Formal Library for Language Generation in the Limit and AI-Assisted Mathematical Research29 Sep 2026
- 2026Hallucination Rates in Language Generation25 Jul 2026
- 2026Flood and Harvest: The Provable Necessity of Trivia for Generating Valuable Mathematics via the Lens of Language Generation in the Limit12 Jun 2026