mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

AESOP: Adversarial Execution-path Selection to Overload Deep Learning Pipelines

arXiv 2605.10987 ↗First posted 9 May 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.CRcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Modern machine learning deployments increasingly compose specialized models into dynamic inference pipelines, where upstream components produce intermediate predictions that determine the workload and inputs of downstream components. The cost of processing an input is therefore not determined by any single model, but by two coupled factors: the per-inference cost of each invoked component and its workload volume. Because these pipelines run under hard real-time constraints, efficiency is a fundamental requirement for system availability. We show that this structure creates an efficiency-attack surface that existing methods targeting single models cannot exploit: on identical inputs and budgets, path-aware targeting inflates FLOPs by 2,407× while the strongest single-model baseline achieves 117× -- a 20× gap attributable entirely to where the attack is directed. We formalize this as the adversarial path-selection problem and present AESOP, a framework combining vulnerability-guided path ranking with adaptive loss weighting. We evaluate AESOP on five pipelines plus a production-realistic deployment variant with batching, bounded buffering, and confidence-threshold defenses. AESOP achieves up to 2,407× FLOPs and 419× latency inflation in white-box setting and 58× FLOPs / 17× latency in gray-box settings. Under system-level defenses, the attack is not neutralized but redirected: pipelines are forced to choose between throughput collapse (0.578 → 0.006 input/s) and 96.7% data loss to sustain throughput.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 May 2026.

Builds on

19 of 42 references.

References · 19

  1. 2020Human Action Recognition from Various Data Modalities: A Reviewcited by 162
  2. 2020Sponge Examples: Energy-Latency Attacks on Neural Networkscited by 108
  3. 2020A Panda? No, It's a Sloth: Slowdown Attacks on Adaptive Multi-Exit Neural Network Inferencecited by 61
  4. 2022NICGSlowDown: Evaluating the Efficiency Robustness of Neural Image Caption Generation Modelscited by 47
  5. 2022Phantom Sponges: Exploiting Non-Maximum Suppression to Attack Deep Object Detectorscited by 28
  6. 2021Taxonomy of Machine Learning Safety: A Survey and Primercited by 22
  7. 2022DeepPerform: An Efficient Approach for Performance Testing of Resource-Constrained Neural Networkscited by 16
  8. 2023SlowTrack: Increasing the Latency of Camera-based Perception in Autonomous Driving Using Adversarial Examplescited by 15
  9. 2023Overload: Latency Attacks on Object Detection for Edge Devicescited by 13
  10. 2023SlothSpeech: Denial-of-service Attack Against Speech Recognition Modelscited by 9
  11. 2022DREAM: A Dynamic Scheduler for Dynamic Real-time Multi-model ML Workloadscited by 8
  12. 2023GradMDM: Adversarial Attack on Dynamic Networkscited by 8
7 more
  1. 2024Loki: A System for Serving ML Inference Pipelines with Hardware and Accuracy Scalingcited by 5
  2. 2025AI Safety Assurance for Automated Vehicles: A Survey on Research, Standardization, Regulationcited by 5
  3. 2017DAGER: Deep Age, Gender and Emotion Recognition Using Convolutional Neural Networkcited by 2
  4. 2020Child Face Age-Progression via Deep Feature Agingcited by 2
  5. 2023Utility-Aware Load Shedding for Real-time Video Analytics at the Edgecited by 2
  6. 2026PARD: Enhancing Goodput for Inference Pipeline via Proactive Request Droppingcited by 2
  7. 2025Exploiting Efficiency Vulnerabilities in Dynamic Deep Learning Systemscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.