mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Why Zeroth-Order Adaptation May Forget Less: A Randomized Shaping Theory

arXiv 2605.10658 ↗First posted 11 May 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Continual learning requires new-task adaptation without damaging previously acquired capabilities. Recent forward-pass and zeroth-order (ZO) results show that low-query adaptation may retain better than first-order (FO) descent, but the usual view of ZO as noisy FO estimation does not explain why. We give a local randomized gradient-shaping analysis: finite differences expose a raw shape that is mean-aligned with FO, while the norm-matched comparator fixes the expected squared adaptation norm. Under this controlled comparison, forgetting depends on how the adaptation shape exposes retention curvature. For norm-matched ZO, the expected shaped retention curvature obeys an exact identity that preserves the isotropic retention floor while contracting only the anisotropic component. Projecting this identity onto the incoming gradient yields the observable FO--ZO quadratic forgetting gap: ZO improves mean forgetting precisely when the FO direction has above-average retention curvature, by a query-dependent fraction of that curvature excess. A practical finite-query accounting separates the mean mechanism from one-batch sampling and smoothing perturbations. As an algorithmic transfer, RISE applies the calibrated ZO shape to exact FO gradients inside parameter blocks. Its target is a stability--plasticity tradeoff: randomized shaping may reduce the retention exposure paid by FO, exact gradients remove finite-smoothing bias from finite-difference ZO, and blockwise sampling supplies many local shaping directions after one gradient computation. The blockwise analysis separates mean-step damage from centered random exposure, showing how block-diagonal curvature, cross-block coupling, and local shaping diagnostics specify where this exact-gradient transfer is most likely to be visible.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 May 2026.

Builds on

27 of 33 references.

References · 27

  1. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  2. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
  3. 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,787
  4. 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,496
  5. 2016iCaRL: Incremental Classifier and Representation Learningcited by 2,333
  6. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,330
  7. 2017Gradient Episodic Memory for Continual Learningcited by 1,898
  8. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,850
  9. 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,729
  10. 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,417
  11. 2018Moment Matching for Multi-Source Domain Adaptationcited by 1,331
  12. 2018Efficient Lifelong Learning with A-GEMcited by 1,058
15 more
  1. 2019Orthogonal Gradient Descent for Continual Learningcited by 369
  2. 2021Gradient Projection Memory for Continual Learningcited by 348
  3. 2023Fine-Tuning Language Models with Just Forward Passescited by 345
  4. 2023Orthogonal Subspace Learning for Language Model Continual Learningcited by 312
  5. 2024Expandable Subspace Ensemble for Pre-Trained Model-Based Class-Incremental Learningcited by 117
  6. 2024Revisiting Zeroth-Order Optimization for Memory-Efficient LLM Fine-Tuning: A Benchmarkcited by 114
  7. 2024Sparse MeZO: Less Parameters for Better Performance in Zeroth-Order LLM Fine-Tuningcited by 54
  8. 2024Enhancing Zeroth-order Fine-tuning for Language Models with Low-rank Structurescited by 50
  9. 2024Make Continual Learning Stronger via C-Flatcited by 35
  10. 2025Harmony in Divergence: Towards Fast, Accurate, and Memory-efficient Zeroth-order LLM Fine-tuningcited by 18
  11. 2025ZeroFlow: Overcoming Catastrophic Forgetting is Easier than You Thinkcited by 9
  12. 2021AlterSGD: Finding Flat Minima for Continual Learning by Alternative Trainingcited by 6
  13. 2025ElasticZO: A Memory-Efficient On-Device Learning with Combined Zeroth- and First-Order Optimizationcited by 5
  14. 2025Forward-Only Continual Learningcited by 1
  15. 2025More Than Memory Savings: Zeroth-Order Optimization Mitigates Forgetting in Continual Learningcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.